Fraudulent Charities
Charity
fraud is the act of using deception
to get money from people who believe they are making donations to a
charity. Often a person or a group
of people will make material representations that they are a charity or part of
a charity and ask prospective donors for contributions to the non-existent
charity.
Charity fraud not only
includes fictitious charities but also deceitful business acts. Deceitful
business acts include charities accepting donations and not using the money for
its intended purposes or the operators of the charities spending much of the
money on themselves.
Throughout the year, and
especially during the holiday season, you will probably get appeals over the
Internet, in the mail, or by telephone urging you to contribute financially to
a good cause. And when disasters hit — whether natural or man-made — fraudulent
websites pop up like weeds, supposedly collecting funds for victims. There are
plenty of fraud operators out there who are scheming for your money and the
last thing on their mind is charity. Not only do such come-ons bilk you from
your money, but they also put money you intended for the needy into the hands
of con artists.
Non-existence charities
Bogus charities that prey
on donors' heartstrings are frequently licensed and allowed to carry on fundraising
for many years before they are shut down, if they are shut down at all. They
organize campaigns that promise they are raising money for such causes as
missing, dying and abused children; local poverty; conquering AIDS in Africa;
medical conditions such as Parkinson's Disease and asthma; helping the lives of
animals; or saving human souls.
.
There is a growing number
of schemes in which a professional fundraising firm has links with a charity,
purportedly to do good works, but its real practice is to make a fast buck for
the operators of the so-called charities.
In one example, a Toronto
based company, the Canadian Organization
for International Philanthropy, had been linked with two charities to raise
$40 million in tax-receipted donations. The charities are All Saints Greek Orthodox Church and the Orion Foundation. The former is a local Toronto church and the
latter is a so-called charity run by a James Arion who worked out of his home
in Stouffville, Ontario.
The promotional material
for this scheme was titled, Fight AIDS,
Save Taxes! They claimed in their promotional material that they planned to
send $350 million in antiviral medication to Africa and had already issued $40
million in tax receipts to donors. The Toronto
Star discovered
that the company was telling donors that they are buying AIDS drug doses at
about $12 a dose when in fact; legitimate charities are buying the drugs
overseas for 30 to 40 cents a dose.
Robert Steen, senior
executive with the Canadian Organization
for International Philanthropy, said they purchase the drugs from a Costa
Rican company called Globe Lending Group.
A search by the Star
was unable to come up with a head office and the company's mailbox is a Costa
Rican company that sets up offshore companies. Steen wouldn’t discuss anything
about his so-called supplier, saying that he wasn’t allowed to talk about the
people behind it. He also couldn’t explain why his so-called charity was paying
so much money for those so-called drugs.
The Wish Kids
Foundation said it was giving dying children their final wish, but its
operators were really just trying to buy themselves an airplane. Canadians Against Child Abuse said it
was trying to stop child abuse, but its executive director was using the money
collected they scammed from the unsuspecting public to pay for his house,
entertainment and vacations with the money.
A Hamilton, Ontario animal charity
has had its charitable status revoked for paying almost
all its incoming cash back out to a questionable fundraising promotion company
and issuing more than $9 million in donation receipts for cash and shares that
did not qualify as gifts.
The Animals’ Charity — based on the 2nd Concession in Lynden was
formerly known as Furry World Rescue
Mission and operated from 2001 with a focus on “improving the lives of
domestic and nondomestic animals by providing education and support,” according
to its website, which was later taken down.
The Canada Revenue Agency said an
audit “revealed that the organization failed to devote its resources
exclusively to its own charitable activities” when it took part in a donation
arrangement with an organization called Innovative
Gifting Inc. (IGI) in 2008. The
organization enthusiastically lent its resources to support the donation
arrangement, with little regard for the legitimacy of the arrangement it had
with Animals’ Charity.
IGI led participating charities to believe they were receiving
shares as a gift from a Swiss philanthropist who would match Canadian donors’
cash donations. However, the philanthropist did not exist. The Ontario
Securities Commission found that IGI
consultants solicited charities to participate. Then IGI charged a fundraising fee to the charities that was equal to 90
per cent of the cash donations each charity received.
There are too many examples of fraudulent charities whose
good acts are non-existent to write about so I will direct you to the next
segment of this article.
Money
donated used to feather operator’s nests
The typical non-profit charity spends
significantly less on overhead than the public thinks. A Record (newspaper in New Jersey, US) review of the most recent tax
returns filed by more than 3,000 New Jersey-based non-profits charities found
that they typically spend about 15 cents of every dollar on overhead expenses
which also includes salaries.
The 50 worst
U.S. charities devoted less than 4% of donations to direct cash aid. Many of
the operators among this bunch of crooks lied to their donors about where their
money went. They took multiple salaries, secretly paid themselves enormous consulting
fees or arranged fundraising contracts with friends.
Here are some examples where the money went to those operators
of those firms soliciting the money from their victims.
American Association of State Troopers. Total raised by
solicitors: $45 million. Paid to the operators: $36 million.
National Veterans Service. Fund Total raised by
solicitors: $70.2 million Paid to operators: $36.9 million.
International Union of Police Associations,
AFL-CIO. Total raised by solicitors: $57.2
million. Paid to the operators: $41.4 million
Breast Cancer Relief Foundation. Total raised
by solicitors: $63.9 million. Paid to the
operators: $44.8 million.
Firefighters Charitable Foundation. Total raised by the solicitors: $63.8 million. Paid to the operators: $54.7 million.
American Cancer Foundation. Total raised by solicitors: $80.8 million. Paid to the operators: $59.8 million
American Breast Cancer Foundation. Total raised
by solicitors: $80.8 million. Paid to the operators: $59.8 million.
Children’s Wish Foundation International. Total raised
by solicitors: $96.8 million. Paid to the operators: $63.6 million
Cancer Fund of America. Total raised
by solicitors: $98 million. Paid to the operators: $80.4 million
Kids Wish Network. Total raised
by solicitors: $127.8 million. Paid to the operators: $109.8 million.
The amount of
money actually sent by these charities to the people in need was between 2.5%
and 8%. How do you feel knowing that for
every dollar you contribute to these charities; between only two and a half
cents to eight cents actually goes to those in need? The difference between the
money sent and the money given to the operators is the expenses incurred in
running the charities such as rent, heat and lights etc.
And now, I will give you an example of a
Canadian charity where the senior operators feathered their nests from the
donations they received. The charity is called PHS Community Services Society which is located in Vancouver,
British Columbia. They claim to be the largest social services provider in
Vancouver’s severely distressed downtown east side of the city. Mark Townsend
was until recently, the executive director and his wife Liz Townsend was until
recently, the co-executive director. Both of these sleaze bags along with two
other executives, Kirsten Stuerbecher and Dan Small and the entire board of
directors were forced to resign when it was learned what was being done with
the charity’s money.
Both Mr. and Mrs. Townsend were paid $120,000 a year as their salaries.
That comes to $10,000 a month and if they worked 40 hours a week, it came to
$62.50 an hour.
But the combined $240,000 a year that they
received wasn’t enough so they took from the donations between $1,400 and
$1,600 a month because they claimed that they did some of the business of the Society in an office they also claimed
was in their home. And over a three-year period, they spent another $11,000 of
the donations having professionals clean their home office on a regular basis. Now
if you think that this expenditure is gross, consider what follows.
The four-mentioned executives took between 40%
and 40% in payments in benefits such as vacation pay each year (which was
$20,000 for each executive) plus $6,500 for each statutory holiday pay for each
executive. There are 12 statutory holidays in Canada so in essence, they were
each paid and additional $78,000 for those holidays. Therefore the total income
they received in in salaries, vacation pay and statutory holidays was $210,000
each year.
Now one would hope that these sleaze bags
would finally stop dipping in the till but no, that wasn’t going to happen at
all. Mrs. Townsend and a Ms. Evens (who was an agent with Society) went to New York in 2009 and stayed at the very expensive
Plaza Hotel. The cost was $9,266. Ms. Even also spent $250 in New York salons.
Did these two horrible people use their own money? Of course not. The money
came from the donations.
The investigating accountants discovered that
there was close to $1 million dollars put on the VISA Platinum Avion credit
cards alone for luxury travel, world famous hotels, fine dining, liquor, floral
arrangements, hair salons, spas and limousines.
As much as $69,000 was spent on 769 visits at restaurants over a three-year period and even
$5,842 was spent on a cruise on the Danube River. There was also a Disneyland
vacation for four in which came to $2,700. These sleaze bags that racked up
those bills didn’t use their own money. They used the money from the
donations.
Further, there were questionable payments to various companies that
submitted inflated invoices which makes me wonder who in Society was pocketing the difference.
Not only should these sleaze bags be ordered to repay these additional
expenses, they should also be charged with fraud.
The Canadian federal government operates the Charities
Directorate, part of the Canada Revenue Agency. Charities are tax exempt and
can issue federal tax receipts to donors. Provincial authorities, usually
through the Public Guardian's office, also have the power to step in and take a
charity to court if it is doing something wrong. Unfortunately, the guardians
across Canada rarely take action.
The Toronto Star found the primary
regulator, the federal Charities Directorate, is virtually powerless to deal
with problem charities. To begin, tax law forbids it from warning the public
about bogus or wayward charities. The directorate, which is part of the Canada
Revenue Agency, treats charities the same way the taxman treats personal
taxpayers. So, even when auditors have found a charity is doing little or no
good work at all they cannot tell the public. Each year about 800 to 1,000
charities are audited and half are told they have done something wrong, but the
public can't find out, even if it would be of major importance. The only way
that the public knows about fraudulent charities is when the press learns of
them and prints stories about them. In many cases, the charity had been allowed
to operate for five years or more, its bold claims of putting the majority of
its money to ‘good works’ unchallenged by the regulator. But when complaints
and often investigations by newspapers prompted an audit, the auditor looks at
the books of the bogus charity. Auditors in the Wish Kids case found the charity did not provide assistance to any
sick children or their families.
Precautions
to take when donating money
Research the charity first.
It’s always good to make sure you’re donating to a legitimate non-profit organization. Check in Google as it will bring to your
attention if anything detrimental has been written up in the media about the
organization.
Ask for the name, address, phone number and whether or not the charity is
registered. If the presenter claims
that it’s registered, get a registration number. An established foundation
usually provides the names of the Board of Directors and general contact
information.
Ask for a copy of their annual report and read over the non-profit's
financial information. These are available
on-line from organizations like Guidestar
listed below. If 10% or more of a non-profit's income goes toward expenses then
your donation may not be benefiting those persons the charity claims to help.
Make sure the
website of the charity you’re donating to uses encryption technology before
entering any sensitive information (i.e. credit card number or bank
draft information).
Always look at the charity’s privacy policy concerning the use of your personal information. Know who’s collecting your information and how they plan
to use it.
Get
a receipt! This allows you to
document your donation for tax reasons, and for your own personal records. Not
to mention if anything ever does arise, you’ll have the proper paper trail the
authorities can use if necessary.
Be wary of email solicitations. Always be cautious when you
receive a charity donation request by email. Some legitimate charities will
email people who have donated before, but never respond to requests where
you’ve never donated, unless you are familiar with the organization.
To
ultimately ensure that your money goes where you intend it to go, you should
always donate directly to the organization. Don’t give it to the kid who comes
to your door.
Be wary of organizations that seem to exist
just to promote the non-profit's head or spokesperson. A non-profit organization should focus on the
beneficiaries of its mission.
I don’t get people coming
to my door seeking donations. That is because I have posted a sign behind the
glass which says the following.
IF YOU ARE HERE TO SEEK
DONATIONS, GOD WILL SEND DOWN A BOLT OF LIGHTENING UPON YOUR HEAD. IF HE
DOESN’T DO THAT, YOU WILL FACE ME AND YOU DON’T WANT TO DO THAT, I ASSURE YOU.
No one has ever come to my
door seeking donations except kids on Halloween. I happily donate candy to them
naturally.
No comments:
Post a Comment