A massacre an American president ignored (Part 1)
Actually there were six massacres
that American presidents ignored. The first one was the Armenian genocide in
which the Turks killed millions. Then there was the Holocaust in which the
Nazis killed more millions. After that, was the massacre of millions in
Cambodia followed by the massacre of 7,000 men and boys in Bosnia. And later came
the slaughter of almost a million in Rwanda.
It is the sixth massacre that is the subject
of this article. I am writing about the massacre that took place in Pakistan
during its 1971 civil war.
Pakistan
was an odd creation with two parts, East and West Pakistan separated from one
another by more than 1,000 miles. The two parts of Pakistan shared few cultural
and social traditions other than Islam. The lack of common bonds was
accentuated when political figures in the West part of Pakistan seized control
of the new state, dominating both political and economic power. This causes
resentment in Eastern part of Pakistan that gradually grew. East Pakistan's
Awami League, led by the Bengali leader Sheik Mujibur Rahman, won a majority of
the seats in the National Assembly (1970). President Yahya Khan in West
Pakistan responded by postponing the opening of the National Assembly to prevent
the Awami League from pursuing greater autonomy for East Pakistan. The result
was civil war.
Begali
nationalists in East Pakistan declared independence on March 26, 1971.
Meanwhile the Pakistani Army in the west attempted to regain control in East Pakistan
and committed terrible atrocities against the people in what later became
Bangladesh. Indian troops entered the
war and quickly defeated the Pakistani Army. The Pakistanis conceded defeat on
December 16, 1971. President Yahya Khan of Pakistan resigned. Zulfikar Ali
Bhutto took over Pakistan and recognized Bangladesh as an independent country.
Formal diplomatic relations were later initiated in 1976.
It
is the atrocities by the Pakistani army that I am writing about in this
article.
During the nine-month long Bangladesh
war for independence, members of the Pakistani
military and supporting militias killed between 300,000 and
3,000,000 men, women and children and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape. The real figures are unknown
since records weren’t kept then of everyone living in Bangladesh at that time.
However, even the murder of 300,000 and the rape of 200,000 are bad enough.
Many of those killed were the
victims of militias who fought with the West Pakistan Army, the Razakars, (collaborators) Al-Shamsand Al-Badr forces, at the
instruction of the Pakistani Army. There
are many mass graves in Bangladesh, and more are continually being discovered
(such as one in an old well near a mosque in Dhaka, located in the Mirpur region of the city, which was discovered in August 1999.
The first night of war on
Bengalis, which is documented in telegrams from the American Consulate in Dhaka
to the United States State Department, saw indiscriminate killing of 500 students of Dhaka University along with
other civilians. There was significant sectarian violence not only perpetrated
by the West Pakistani army, but also by Bengali nationalists against non-Bengali minorities, especially the Biharis.
Pakistan’s secret service, in conjunction with the
political party Jamaat-e-Islami, formed militias such as Al-Badr (the moon) and the Al-Shams (the sun) to conduct operations against the nationalist
movement. These militias targeted noncombatants and committed rapes as well as
other crimes. Local collaborators also took part in the atrocities. The term has since become a pejorative akin to the western term “Judas”
Members of the Muslim league such as Nizam-e-Islam, Jamaat-e-Islami and Jamiat Ulema
Pakistan, who had lost the election, collaborated with the military and acted
as an intelligence organization for them. Jamaat-e-Islami
members and some of its leaders collaborated with the Pakistani forces in rapes
and targeted killings. The atrocities
by Al-Badr and the Al-Shams garnered worldwide attention from news agencies;
accounts of massacres and rapes that were widely reported.
During the war, the Pakistan Army
and its local collaborators, mainly Jamaat
e Islami carried out a systematic execution
of the leading Bengali intellectuals. A number of professors from Dhaka
University were killed during the first few days of the war.
However, the most extreme cases of targeted killing of intellectuals took place during the last few days of the
war. Professors, journalists, doctors, artists, engineers and writers were
rounded up by Pakistan Army and the Razakar militia in Dhaka, blindfolded, taken to torture cells in
Mirpur, Mohammadpur, Nakhalpara, Rajarbagh and other
locations in different sections of the city to be executed en-masse, most
notably at Rayerbazar and Mirpur.
During the nine-month duration of
the war, the Pakistani army, with the assistance of local collaborators
systematically executed an estimated 991 teachers, 13 journalists, 49
physicians, 42 lawyers, and 16 writers, artists and engineers. Even after the
official ending of the war on December 16 there were reports of killings being
committed by either the armed Pakistani soldiers or by their collaborators. In
one such incident, notable film-maker Jahir Raihan was killed on January 30, 1972 in Mirpur allegedly by the
armed Beharis. In memory of the persons who were killed, December 14 is
observed in Bangladesh as Shaheed Buddhijibi Dibosh (Day of the Martyred
Intellectuals) Several notable intellectuals who were killed from the time
period of March 25 to 16 December 16, 1971 in different parts of the country
include Dhaka University professors. It
is obvious that West Pakistan wanted to bankrupt Bangladesh of its intellectuals.
The generally accepted figure for
the mass rapes during the nine-month long conflict is 200,000. Numerous women
were tortured, raped and killed during the war. Again, exact numbers are not
known and are a subject of debate. Bangladeshi sources cite a figure of 200,000
women raped, giving birth to thousands of war-babies.
The Pakistani Army also kept numerous Bengali women as sex-slaves inside the
Dhaka Cantonment. Most of the girls were captured from Dhaka
University and private
homes.
The licentious conduct of the
soldiers, although generally supported by their superiors, alarmed the regional
high command of the Pakistani army.
Many people in Bangladesh,
especially the Hindus, were specific targets of the Pakistani army. There was
widespread killing of Hindu males, and rapes of women. Documented incidents in
which Hindus were massacred in large numbers include the Chuknagar massacre, (8,000 to 10,000 men) theJathibhanga
massacre, (3,000 to 3,500 men) and the Shankharipara massacre (a few dozen men and women).
President Nixon was in power then.
What did he do to stop the massacres? Nothing. He certainly knew about them.
Archer Blood was the American consul general in Dacca in Easter Pakistan who
tried to get the president and Henry Kissinger who was at that time the White
House national security advisor to do something.
So why did Nixon sit on his royal
ass and do nothing to stop the West Pakistanis from murdering the people in
Eastern Pakistan? The reason was that the
United States and Pakistan were allies in their fight with the Soviets. The US were
selling Pakistan millions of dollars in armaments. Nixon, the ass he was didn’t want to interfere
with his ally’s fight with the people in East Pakistan notwithstanding that
hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children were being slaughtered
with the weapons sold to Pakistan by the Americans. That useless bum could have
at least told the Pakistan army to cease otherwise no more armaments would be
sold to them. He could have put an end to the massacres but chose to twiddle
his thumbs. While he twiddled, women and girls were raped and men, women and
children were slaughtered. That is not only his legacy; it is also the legacy
of the United States.
In later articles, I will explain
why the presidents of the United States didn’t try to stop the massacres I
mentioned in the beginning of this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment