Evil best deserves to
suffer for what evil
does
On May 30, 2005, an American student, Natalee
Holloway, 19, from Alabama vanished
on a high school graduation trip to Aruba, a Caribbean country
within the Kingdom of
the Netherlands.
Holloway, who had been scheduled to fly home later on May
30, did not appear for her return flight, and her packed luggage and passport
were found in her Holiday Inn room.
She had previously been seen by her American classmates
leaving the Aruban bar and night club Carlos'n Charlie's
around 1:30 am on May 30. Holloway actually left with 17-year-old Joran van der Sloot,
a Dutch honors student living in Aruba and attending the Aruba International
School, and his two Surinamese friends,
21-year-old Deepak Kalpoe
and 18-year-old Satish Kalpoe, in Deepak Kalpoe's car. The four suspects
were subsequently arrested.
On July 25, 2005, the reward for Holloway's safe return
was increased from $200,000 to $1,000,000, with a $100,000 reward for
information leading to the location of her remains. Following Holloway's
disappearance, a reward of $50,000 had been established for her return. In
August 2005, the reward for information as to her remains was increased from
$100,000 to $250,000.
With the help of hundreds of volunteers, Aruban
investigators conducted an extensive search for Holloway. Special Agents from the FBI,
fifty Dutch soldiers
and three specially equipped Dutch Air
Force F-16 aircraft participated in the search.
In addition to the ground search, divers examined the ocean floor for evidence
of Holloway's body. The searches were unsuccessful; Holloway's body was never
found.
Van der Sloot admitted seeing
her by telling the authorities several different scenarios, including leaving
her drunk on the beach and selling her into the sex trade. He was twice
arrested but never formally charged for any crime relating to the case in Aruba.
On September 3, 2005, all four of the detained suspects
were released by a judge despite the attempts of the prosecution to keep them
in custody, on the condition that they remain available to police.
Subsequently, on September 14, all restrictions on them were removed by the Combined Appeals Court of the Netherlands Antilles and
Aruba.
On December 18, 2007, Aruban prosecutors announced that
the case would be closed without any charges being brought against him and
three of his friends who were with him the night she disappeared. The Aruban
prosecutor's office reopened the case on February 1, 2008, after receiving
video footage of van der Sloot, under the influence of marijuana, making statements that Holloway
died on the morning of May 30, 2005, and that he disposed of her body. Van der
Sloot later denied that what he said was true.
A broadcast aired on February 3, 2008, included excerpts
from footage recorded from hidden cameras and microphones in the vehicle of
Patrick van der Eem, a Dutch businessman and ex-convict, who gained Van der
Sloot's confidence. Van der Sloot was seen smoking marijuana
and stating that he was with Holloway when she began convulsively
shaking, then she became unresponsive. Van der Sloot stated that he attempted
to revive her, without success. He said that he called a friend, who told Van
der Sloot to go home and that the friend disposed of the body. An individual
reputed to be this friend, identified in the broadcast as Daury, subsequently
denied Van der Sloot's account, indicating that he was then at school in
Rotterdam.
In 2010, van der
Sloot was charged with attempting to extort $250,000 from Beth Holloway,
(Natalee’s mother) in exchange for the exact location and details of her
daughter’s death. Holloway had given him $25,000 as a down payment, but he took
the money and traveled to Peru to play in a poker tournament using Mrs.
Hathaway’s money.
While he was in
Lima, Peru, he met college student, Stephany Flores
and talked her into going with him into his Lima hotel room. He later killed
her when he realized that she had found incriminating materials in his computer
connecting him to the murder of Natalee Holloway. Van der Sloot admitted to
killing Flores, but blamed post-traumatic stress disorder for being accused of
Holloway’s disappearance which he claimed made him kill the Peruvian girl. Flores
was murdered five years to the day that Holloway disappeared.
The 26-year-old
murderer was sentenced
to 28 years, in a Peruvian prison for two years short of the maximum
sentence of 30 years. When I was in Lima in 1980 as a speaker at a UN crime conference,
I was invited by the Peruvian justice minister to visit one of the Peruvian
prisons. Believe me when I tell you that that country’s prisons are not what
you will ever want to serve time in. Van der Sloot was also ordered to pay the
Flores family $75,000 in damages. He also faces 25 years in the American
extortion case.
In 2010, Beth
Holloway was able to sneak into the Peruvian jail to question van der Sloot
about her daughter’s disappearance. Holloway was accompanied by Dutch
investigative journalist Peter de Vries, who captured the visit on camera.
Holloway was able to get van der Sloot to admit to the extortion, but not to
the truth about what happened to her daughter.
In May 2012, , an agreement was
reached last year between the United States and Peru, that van der Sloot would
be extradited
to the US to face charges in the United States on the basis that while he
was in Peru, he was a foreign national. The extradition stalled after van der
Sloot’s lawyer was able to negotiate an eleventh-hour deal to keep the Dutchman
in Peru. By marrying a local Peruvian, he could automatically apply for
Peruvian citizenship, which would hinder America’s chances of extraditing him.
Leydi Figueroa Uced, a 22-year-old
Peruvian woman regularly visited van der Sloot in Piedras Gordas prison. His
lawyer, Máximo Altez, confirmed the impending nuptials, was to take place in
prison in sometime in June, 2013. Last October van der Sloot told the Dutch
daily De
Telegraaf that his bride-to-be was pregnant with his child, but no
reports of the baby’s birth have since been released. Conjugal visits are
allowed in Peruvian prisons if couples register as common-law partners, as these
two lovebirds were and still are.
The now 26-year-old Dutchman’s new
bride sanity may be questionable for her taste in men. I am forced to ask myself what prompted this woman to want to marry a
man who is suspected of murdering one woman and who has been convicted of
murdering another woman. I believe such women are losers and because they feel
superior to other losers who are murders and sentenced to long terms of
imprisonment, they choose to marry them. While no one can know for sure
whether van der Sloot and Figueroa Uced are truly in love, this murderer by marrying
a Peruvian woman and fathering her child may save him from being extradited to
the United States to face a trial for extortion.
I believe that van der
Sloop murdered Natalee Holoway also and I hope he remains in the Peruvian
prison for the entire length of his sentence before he is released. As the
title of this article says, evil best deserves to suffer for what evil does.
No comments:
Post a Comment