Can the Freedom of Speech be
stretched too far?
One of the most cherished freedoms
we have is our right to speak our own minds. But are there limits as to just
how far we can stretch that freedom before it becomes a crime?
In the southern town of Sorgues in France, a young mother who sent her three-year-old son whose name is Jihad to
school in a T-shirt reading “I am a bomb” and “Jihad, born on September 11” was
given a suspended prison term and a fine for defending criminal acts such as
terrorism.
Bouchra Bagour said she had simply wanted to mark the
birthday of her son, Jihad who was born on September 11 and she had not
intended any connection with the 9/11 attacks in the United States in 2001.
Previously, she had been acquitted in April by another
court on charges of defending terrorism but prosecutors had appealed the
decision.
On Friday, an appeal court Nimes reversed the ruling, and
fined Bagour 2,000 euros ($2,700) and gave her a suspended one-month jail term.
Her brother Zeyad, who gave his nephew the T-shirt, was fined 4,000 euros ($5,400)
and given a two-month suspended prison sentence. Under French law, justifying a
crime in public is punishable by up to five years in prison and a 45,000-euro ($61,059.00
US) fine.
Bagour, 35 at the time of the first trial, had admitted in
court that sending her child to school wearing the T-shirt had been tactless,
but she insisted it was not meant as a provocation. Her brother Zeyad, 29 at
the time, told the court, “We were never trying to claim responsibility for
this thing or defend a cause.”
The lawyer for the pair said that the decision was harsh
and surprising, adding that she would consider sending the case to the
Paris-based Supreme Court for a final arbitration.
First of all, had the mother sent her child to school
with only the words, “I was born on September 11th, that wouldn’t be
offensive. But coupled with the words, “I am a bomb.” that is definitely
tactless, stupid and showing disrespect to the thousands who died in that 9/11
event.
Even though the mother and her brother denied
supporting terrorism (and I believe them) anyone reading the words on that
T-shirt could believe that whoever put those words on the T-shirt and anyone
who permitted a child to wear it, was in fact supporting terrorism. Is it any
different if she taught her son to say, “I support terrorism?”
What was really stupid was sending her son to school with the words, “I
am a bomb” on his T-shirt. If she was in an airport with her son wearing that
T-shirt, panic would ensue and armed police would surround her and pounce on
her. The bomb squad would be called and the explosive experts would be called
to make sure that the boy wasn’t carrying a bomb and the terminal would be
evacuated.
Furthermore, the name of her son being Jihad is a rather foolish name to
name your son in this present era because there is no escaping the violent
contexts within which some extremists wage what they consider as a jihad. Responding
to calls for jihad, fighters leave their own lands to fight in Afghanistan,
Iraq, and elsewhere. Terrorist groups adopt the term and frame their cause
under its auspices.
However, the word Jihad
can mean “anything from an internal struggle one has within one’s self, such as
with a perceived weakness, a struggle with one’s faith, and a physical fight or
battle. I would
however be less than honest if I didn’t point out that the word, Jihad is not
an unusual first name for Muslims but I would think that giving a child that
name when the family lives in a non-Islamic country is just asking for
trouble.
When you join the word “Jihad” with “I am a bomb” and September 11”,
there are clearly terroristic connotations in the combined words. It would
cause someone seeing such words on a T-shirt as suspecting that the parent of
such a child supports terrorism.
In my opinion, both the mother and uncle of the child broke the law as
it applies in France. Anyone walking around with a sign or yelling that you are
a bomb is the actions of a terrorist even if there isn’t a bomb in your
possession. Now obviously, the boy and her mother and uncle were not terrorists
but the implication is definitely clear enough so that anyone who permits a
child to wear such foolishness on a T-shirt must be supporting acts of
terrorism, even if in fact they are not.
The Canadian Criminal Code
does not criminalize terrorist activity per se and does not make
membership in a terrorist group a crime. It does, however, create a
series of crimes which, broadly speaking, make it an offence to engage in
conduct that facilitates, promotes, assists or otherwise encourages terrorist
activities or terrorist groups.
Is wearing a T-shirt that states;
“I am a bomb” promoting terrorism? Well
for one thing, it could cause a panic and causing a panic because you have
convinced those around you that you have a bomb could be construed as an act of
terrorism and if so, it would therefore be against the law.
Section 83.18, subsection
(4) of the Canadian Criminal Code provides as follows:
In determining whether an
accused participates in or contributes to any activity of a terrorist group,
the court may consider, among other factors, whether the accused
(a)
uses
a name, word, symbol or other representation that identifies or is associated
with the terrorist group.
If a person in Canada wears a T-shirt in which he
had stamped on it; “I am a jihadist with Al Qaeda” is he promoting terrorism? I
don’t think so. If on his T-shirt that he is wearing it says; “I am a bomb”
then he is definitely promoting terrorism but not a specific terrorist group
and that being as it is, he is not violating the Anti-Terrorism Act.
Fear is a distressing emotion usually aroused by
some impending danger, evil, or even anxiety. The threat can be either real or
imagined. Obviously, anyone who sees someone wearing a T-shirt that has the
words, “I am a bomb” stamped on it, will illicit fear in the mind of that
person who sees it because he or she doesn’t know if the person wearing the
T-shirt has a concealed bomb on his or her body.
Would
wearing such a T-shirt in Canada be against the law?
There are limits to the protection
given to us under our Freedom of Speech legislation however, if a speech in
question causes harm to others, it can be restricted. For example, you can't
erroneously yell “FIRE!” in a crowded theater when there is no fire in the
theatre so it follows that you cannot wear a T-shirt that says that you are a
bomb even if there is no bomb on your person. In doing so, in Canada, you would be breaking
the law.
In the United States in some of the
states, they have statutes for Disorderly Conduct, Breach of
Peace or Creating a Public Disturbance which contains such wording as “Causes
inconvenience, annoyance or alarm which could mean almost
anything that may cause fear or anxiety to anyone. Wearing such a T-shirt in public could be
considered a crime and rightly so.
No comments:
Post a Comment