Fake Reviews
Whenever I want to go to a movie,
I go to my computer and look at the movies being shown in my area. After I see
what that I believe will interest me, I look for the reviews. I know that I can
trust what the moviegoers say about the movies because they are not putting in
fake reviews on behalf of the theatre or the producers of the movies. It would
be pointless for the owner of a movie theater to put in a review that praises
the movie because if the movie is great, there will be a great many favourable
reviews entered and if it stinks, the reviews of the theatregoers will say so
However, if I am searching for a restaurant
to eat at, I have some suspicions that the reviews may not have been put in the
interview by the restaurants customers but by the restaurant itself. The same
goes for the hotels, motels and resorts. Mind you I have seen reviews that are
not favourable to some restaurants or hotels but if there are many such reviews
and one then shows up praising the restaurant, the hotel, motel or resort, I
just know that it was written by the owners of those establishments.
In an increasingly
tech-reliant world, most of us do not step foot in a restaurant or buy anything
online without doing at least a small Internet research. And who better to look
to before making a reservation or adding a gadget to your shopping cart than
other consumers who have dined at that restaurant, spent a night at the hotel
or used that gadget you are interested in buying? Nine out of ten shoppers say that
reviews of products and services help determine where they spend their
hard-earned cash. Sadly, some of the reviews we relied upon were in fact, absolutely
fake.
The office of the New York
Attorney General recently announced that it had conducted Operation Clean Turf, a year-long undercover investigation into the
manipulation of consumer-review websites by the companies that create these
fake reviews, as well as the clients that pay for them.
Posing as the owner of a Brooklyn yogurt shop,
representatives of the Attorney General's office contacted ‘search engine
optimization’ (SEO) companies and requested assistance combating negative
reviews on consumer-review websites. Some of these companies offered to write
fake reviews praising the yogurt shop and post them on sites such as Yelp.com,
Google Local and Citysearch.com, as part of the companies' reputation
management services. SOE’s customers know that good consumer reviews have significant impact on their company's success.
Now how you look at it, SEO and their customers
are committing commercial fraud. It is no different than investment companies
selling investments that are part of a pyramid scheme. It is outright
corruption.
The Attorney General’s
investigation also revealed that the SEO companies used advanced IP spoofing
techniques to hide their identities, as well as set up hundreds of false online
profiles on consumer-review websites in order to post the bogus reviews.
Besides these dishonest companies using their own employees to write and post
the fake reviews, these companies hired freelance writers from as far away as
the Philippines, Bangladesh and Eastern Europe for $1 to $10 per review. The
consumer then believes that the review was made by someone in those countries
that visited the companies in the U.S. and are now sending in their reviews.
According to the New York
Attorney General, the SEO companies also solicited people on Craigslist.com,
Freelancer.com and other sites to write fake reviews. The companies were not
always subtle in recruiting people to engage in their fraudulent practices. For
example, one company's solicitation stated:
“We need a person that can post multiple positive reviews
on major REVIEW sites. Example: Google Maps, Yelp, CitySearch. Must be from
different IP addresses. So you must be able to have multiple IPs. The reviews
will be only few sentences long. Need to have some understanding on how Yelp
filters works. Previous experience is a plus. Just apply. We are a marketing company.”
As a result of the New York Attorney General's
investigation, 19 companies agreed to stop writing fake online reviews of
products and services and they had to pay more than $350,000 in penalties.
Many consumer-review websites such as Yelp have
implemented filters to detect or delete fake reviews. Recently, automotive
information site Edmunds.com sued a company that allegedly posted more than 60
fake reviews of car dealers on its site.
When we are given a hundred dollar bill, we tend to take a second look
at it because of so many counterfeits are circulating. You should also take a
second look at reviews because so many fake reviews are also circulating. The problem is greater than you think. On
average, one if five reviews is a fake. The burden of spotting fake reviews
inevitably falls on consumers
themselves.
The tips re locating the fakes I got from TIME.
The tips re locating the fakes I got from TIME.
Psychologists have found that
people typically tend to use fewer personal pronouns when they’re lying. The
son doesn’t say, “Hey Mom, I broke your vase.” He invokes the passive,
distances himself from the event and says, “Hey, that vase got broken.” But
fake reviewers, Cornell researchers have found, are trying to convince the
world that they did something they didn’t do—so they overcompensate in the
opposite direction by using more first-person pronouns. That could be saying “I
ate the ravioli” when a normal person would write, “The ravioli was just
delectable.
Fake reviews tend to be overdone
and emotional. Look for superlatives, descriptions of rooms or meals or rides
that weren’t just good but the best thing that ever happened this side of the Mississippi! Fake reviews
for a Nashville-based company that sells guitar-lesson DVDs, and was fined by
the Federal Trade Commission, described the discs as being the “undisputed #1
training product.” That is not how unbiased, normal people talk about things
they purchase. It is the way a salesman talks—one who is trying to sell you the
product.
Certain words crop up more in fake
reviews of hotels than real ones do, such as us, price, stay,
feel, nice, deal and comfort. For restaurants,
words such as options, went, seat, helpful, overall,
serve, and amount were common words in false write-ups.
People tend to use figurative
language when reviewing hedonic products—those purchased for pleasure, and more
straightforward language when reviewing utilitarian products, those purchased
because they’re stuff you need. If someone is writing up an opinion on a
certain brand of chocolate bars, for instance, a metaphor about them being “to
die for” wouldn’t be out of line. But if someone says “well made” that is a
beacon in their cold, dark night and for this reason, some warning bells should
be going off in your head.
The web has created some fantastic opportunities for
authors, publishers and self-publishers alike. I strongly suspect that many
authors are submitting their own reviews into Amazon and Barnes & Noble.
Author Stephen Leather confessed, during an on-stage panel discussion, that he
used fake accounts to promote his own books. He admitted to creating accounts
on forums under assumed names in order to “create a buzz” about his own
work. He also promotes and reviews his work using at least one pseudonymous
Twitter account. This is how he got his own reviews into the Internet. He said
in part;
“I will go into several well-known
forums and post [my reviews] under various names. I build this whole network of
people who talk about my books.”
I have had six of my books
published and only one person has written a review of one of those books. I would feel shamed if I opened up the site
and saw only my own fake review. I would rather have no reviews than see my own
fake reviews staring at my face. Obviously, it didn’t bother Leather. If
someone doesn’t like any of my books, they are free to say it.
The widespread use of “fake identities” is causing untold
damage to the publishing world. It has got to the point where potential readers
of books sold online are becoming suspect of the reviews. RJ Ellory, the
bestselling British crime writer was exposed for writing fake online reviews
lauding himself while at the same time, criticizing his rivals, a practice he
had been doing for the past decade. In his confession, he said in part;
“Over the last ten years I have posted approximately 12
reviews of my own books, and I also criticized a book written by Stuart
MacBride, and another by Mark Billingham, both of whom had done nothing to
warrant such criticism.”
He was in effect spitting in the face of his potential
readers and doing it for money. He should be barred from placing any of his
books on the sites he lauded himself or criticized other authors. That is a punishment that would stop this
detestable conduct from flourishing in the publishing industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment