Is murder an appropriate charge for a cop who shot a man in the back?
I and millions of other TV viewers
saw the images taken by a bystander of a North Charleston, Carolina cop (Michael
T. Slager) shooting Walter L Scott, an unarmed black man in the back while he
was running from the cop. They also saw the cop then walk back to the location
where he fired his gun from and then pick up his Taser and walk back to the man
who was lying in his belly and who was either dead then or or dying and drop it
near the man’s body. If it wasn’t for the bystander’s video, it is conceivable
that the officer would claim that he shot his victim in self defence. However,
he would have a hard time coming up with that defence since the man was shot in
the back and from a distance as there were no powder burns on the man’s
clothing.
Slager was arrested, charged
with murder and then he was fired from the North Charleston Police Department. At
the time of this writing, he is still in jail without bond.
The question that comes to the fore is this. Should the charge against this cop be first degree murder or second
degree murder?
The most serious murder charge a defendant can face
is first degree murder, commonly known as premeditated murder. But any
killing, even accidental that occurs during the commission of a felony (such as
robbery or arson etc) also may be charged as first degree murder in most
states, including North Carolina. Under North Carolina's first degree murder
laws, convicted individuals may be sentenced to life in prison or even death by
lethal injection.
First degree murder
is causing the death of another person in one of the following means: by means of a weapon of
mass destruction; by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, torture, or
by any other kind of willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing; In
the perpetration or attempted perpetration of any arson, rape or a sex offense,
robbery, kidnapping, burglary, or other felony committed or attempted with
the use of a deadly weapon.
I have underlined two of the means. Did Slager willfully, deliberately
and with premeditation shoot Scott to death?
I don’t think so. He was shooting at Scott to stop him from running
away. Did he commit a felony or make an attempt to commit a felony by using his
gun? Admittedly shooting a person in the back is in itself a felony but the law
actually refers to using a weapon to commit a crime such as a burglary or
robbery etc.
First degree murder defendants may simply argue
that the prosecution has not proved all elements of a first
degree murder charge typically that the defendant killed willfully,
deliberately and with premeditation. Though the defendant may support such an
argument with evidence, he or she is not required to do so, as proof of all
elements of the crime falls on the shoulders of the prosecution.
A defendant arguing self defense must show that the
killing resulted from a reasonable use of force to resist a reasonable fear of
death or bodily harm. That defence won’t
apply in Slager’s case since Scott was running away from him.
Certain killings by law enforcement and other
public officers qualify as justified homicides. If an officer kills someone in
the exercise of duty and without an unlawful intent, recklessness or
negligence, that killing generally does not constitute murder, let alone first
degree murder.
That defence wouldn’t be available to Slager since
him shooting a man in the back as many times that Slager shot Scott just to
stop him from running away is doing so with an unlawful intent. Shooting one’s gun eight times at someone
running away, someone who isn’t a present danger to anyone in the immediate
area is unlawful.
In
State v. Jones, a case heard in South
Carolina, the defendant, Jones driving while impaired by alcohol and drugs,
recklessly collided with another vehicle and killed two of its occupants in
their car. Jones was convicted of two counts of first-degree felony murder and
sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. That decision was based on the
killings of the two men during the felonies of assault with a deadly weapon
(his car).
The
North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the defendant was improperly convicted
of the two counts of first-degree felony murder because the underlying
felonies—felonious assaults—were only committed through culpable negligence.
The court stated that a defendant must purposely resolve to commit the
underlying felony under the felony murder theory of first-degree murder which
in that case, Jones didn’t.
In my respectful opinion, I seriously doubt that
Slager will be facing a first degree murder when he goes to trial. It would be
impossible for the prosecutor to prove that it was Slager’s intention to murder
Scott since there was no motive that would benefit the officer financially or in
revenge by shooting Scott in his back since his real motive was to stop Scott
from running away from him. This then leaves a possible second degree murder
being laid.
In North Carolina, to convict someone of second
degree murder, the prosecutor must prove that malice was
necessary to prove second degree murder that is based on an inherently
dangerous act or omission, done in such a reckless and wanton manner as to
manifest a mind utterly without regard for human life and social duty and
deliberately bent on mischief.
There is no doubt in my mind that when Slagger shot Scott to death by shooting at his back while Scott was running from him, his act was uncalled for, unjustified and done in a reckless manner and disregard for Scott’s life.
However, it appears from that law that the
prosecutor must also prove that Slagger shot Scott to death because the officer
was bent on creating mischief. Governed by state law, criminal mischief is committed
when a perpetrator, having no right to do so nor any
reasonable ground to believe that he/she has such right, intentionally injures
another person. The word “mischief” can apply in criminal assault
cases because it denotes an injury or harm caused by a person to another person.
According to North Carolina law, a person killing
another when the killing was committed in heat of passion could be charged with
voluntary manslaughter. But that really appeals to extreme anger when two
people are fighting one another. This wouldn’t apply to a defence for Slager
since he shot a man who was running away from him.
It is ironic when you think about it. Had Scott not bolted out of his
car and tried to escape from Slager, he would be alive today. Further, he
mistakenly presumed that because he was behind in almost $7,500 in child
support payments that there was a warrant for his arrest. In actual act, there
wasn’t a warrant for his arrest. Minutes later, Officer Slager would have let
him go on his way.
In San Jose, California on
February 17, 2004, plainclothes officers were attempting to serve a warrant for
a drug-related parole violation on David Gonzales. Unfortunately, 43-year-old
Rodolfo Cardenas, a father of five, had the misfortune of being in the wrong
place at the wrong time. The officers saw Cardenas and assumed he was David
Gonzales, the man they were looking for and when they pointed their guns at
Cardenas, he became frightened so he then fled first in his vehicle, then on
foot but he was shot in the back and killed. Dorothy Duckett, a 78-year-old
neighbor, told the San Jose Mercury News that when Cardenas was running
away, he had his hands in the air and was yelling, “Don’t shoot.” Michael Walker, the California Bureau of Narcotics
Enforcement officer who fired the fatal shot, was charged with voluntary
manslaughter but was acquitted by a San Jose jury in 2005
Paul Bates, age 73, a white volunteer sheriff's deputy in
Tulsa County, Oklahoma on April 2, 2015, shot and killed a black man who was on
the ground being arrested. Law enforcement people initially said that the
volunteer deputy had mistaken his own handgun for a Taser while trying to
subdue the man and bring him into custody. The victim, Eric Harris after being
shot screamed, “He shot me.” A deputy replied, “You fucking ran. Shut the fuck
up.” Then the victim complained that he was having difficulty breathing. In the video of the shooting, a deputy was
heard telling the man, “Fuck your breath.”
Officers Hymon and Wright in
the State of Tennessee were responding to a burglary call when Hymon spotted Garner, an unarmed 15-year-old, by a fence in the
backyard of the home in question. After Hymon ordered Garner to halt, the
teenager tried to climb the fence. In response, the officer shot him fatally in
the head. A federal district court ruled that the shooting was justified under
a Tennessee statute—the law said that once a police officer voices intent to
arrest a suspect, “the officer may use all the necessary means to affect the
arrest.” Garner's father appealed and the case ended up in the Supreme Court,
which ruled the
Tennessee statute unconstitutional and the killing unjustified. Justice Byron
White wrote for the majority: “It
is not better that all felony suspects die than that they escape. Where the
suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the
harm resulting from failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly
force to do so.”
I honestly believe that Slager will be convicted of second degree
murder. Now you will want to know what the minimum and maximum sentence for
second degree murder in North Carolina is. It is 94 months (7 years and 10
months) to 484 months (40 years and 3 months) depending on prior record of
convictions.
That shooting in North Carolina wasn’t the first time a citizens has
been killed by police officers.
Officer Livoti choked to death 29-year-old Anthony Baez in a
case that would later be featured in a PBS documentary titled Every
Mother's Son. After their football struck his
patrol car, Livoti had ordered Baez and his brother to leave the area. When the
brothers refused, Livoti attempted an arrest. After Baez allegedly resisted,
the officer administered the choke hold that
ended his life. Livoti, who had been accused of brutality 11 times over 11 years, was
charged with criminally negligent homicide, but found not guilty during
a state trial in October 1996. He was fired the following year, however, after
a judge ruled his choke hold illegal. In June 1998, a federal jury sentenced him to 7.5 years in
prison for violating Baez's civil rights, and the Baez family received a $3 million settlement from the city later that year. In 2003, two more cops
were fired for giving false testimony in Livoti’s defense.
Amadou Diallo, an unarmed, 23-year-old immigrant from Guinea,
was killed in the vestibule of his own building when four white police officers fired 41 shots, striking
him 19 times. Diallo had just returned home from his job as a street vendor at
12:44 a.m. when he was confronted by the plainclothes officers. The officers
later said he matched the description of
a rape suspect, and that they mistakenly believed he was reaching for a gun.
(He was pulling out his wallet.) Three of the officers had been involved in
previous shootings, including one that led to the death of another black civilian in 1997. The four cops were acquitted of all charges,
prompting citywide protests. They were not fired, either, but lost permission to carry a
weapon—although one of the officers eventually had his carrying privilege restored.
In 2004, Diallo's family received a $3 million settlement from
the city.
Early on New Year's Day, BART transit officers responding to
reports of fighting on a train detained Oscar Grant, 22, and several other men
on the platform at Fruitvale Station. In an incident captured on cell phone
cameras, Officer Mehserle pulled out his gun and fatally shot Grant, who was
face down on the platform at the time. Mehserle later testified that he thought he was reaching for his Taser while
trying to put handcuffs on Grant, who resisted. A jury found Mehserle guilty of
involuntary manslaughter and sentenced him to two years in jail. He was released after serving 11 months at the Los Angeles County
Jail.
Sammy Yatim, an 18-year-old Toronto man, was shot eight
times and missed once by 30-year-old Toronto Police Service officer James Forcillo who was
standing very close to the sidewalk while the victim was at the inside entrance
of the streetcar. Yatim had previously brandished a three-inch knife and exposed himself while the streetcar was in
motion. After being shot and lying on his belly, another officer who got inside
the streetcar from another entrance then he Tasered Yatim on his back. He was later pronounced dead at St. Michael's Hospital.
The incident was video recorded by a bystander and footage of it was released
for public viewing. On August 19, 2013, James Forcillo was charged with second-degree murder. On July 30, 2014, he
was additionally charged with attempted murder. He is currently awaiting trial.
Narcotics officers who kill
innocent people in the war on drugs often don’t even face suspensions, let
alone criminal charges. But the conduct of three Atlanta police officers in the
killing of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston was so unscrupulous that all three
faced criminal charges.
On November 21, 2006,
plainclothes officers Jason R. Smith, Gregg Junnier and Arthur Tesler carried
out a no-knock drug raid on Johnston’s Atlanta home based on bad information
from an informant/marijuana dealer named Alex White. When they broke in, Johnston
(who lived alone in a high-crime area of the city and kept a gun in her house
for protection) assumed she was being the victim of a home invasion and fired a
shot. But a lot more shooting was done by the officers: a total of 39 shots
were fired, several of which hit her. And while Johnston was lying on the floor
dying, Smith handcuffed her. An investigation revealed that after Johnston’s
death, a major cover-up was attempted, including planting bags of marijuana in
her house and trying to bully White into lying and saying that Johnston was
selling crack cocaine. Smith, Junnier and Tesler faced a variety of charges
from both the federal government and the state of Georgia. Smith and Junnier
both pled guilty to charges of voluntary manslaughter; Smith also pled guilty
to perjury and admitted he planted the marijuana in Johnston’s house. And all
three of them pled guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate her civil
rights. In a civil suit, Johnston’s family was awarded a $490,000 settlement.
On January 4, 2008, narcotics
officer Joseph Chavalia shot and killed 26-year-old Tarika Wilson in Lima,
Ohio. Wilson, a single mother, had been romantically involved with a suspected
drug dealer named Anthony Terry (who later pled guilty to selling drugs). When
Chavalia and other narcotics officers raided the house where Wilson was living,
Terry was nowhere to be found. Wilson, however, was in one of the bedrooms;
when Chavalia fired shots into that bedroom, she was killed. Wilson’s
one-year-old child was also shot but survived, although one of his fingers
needed to be amputated. Chavalia later said he thought shots were coming from
that bedroom, but the fact that he killed an unarmed woman holding a baby was
inexcusable, especially in light of the fact that Wilson, according to her
sister Tania Wilson, was not involved in drug sales herself. Using a SWAT team
to go after a small-time drug dealer is bad police work. Although Chavalia
was acquitted of criminal charges, Wilson’s family was awarded $2.5 million in
2010 in a civil lawsuit against the city of Lima.
On August 9,
1999, 64-year-old Mario Paz was in his home in Southern California when up to
20 narcotics officers for the city of El Monte conducted a no-knock raid and
used a grenade during the attack. Some of the officers claimed that Paz
appeared to be going for a gun, and they fatally shot him twice in the back in
front of his wife. Although Paz was a gun owner, he never shot at the officers.
No drugs were found in the house, and Bill Ankeny (El Monte’s assistant police
chief) later acknowledged that there was never any evidence of the Paz family
being involved in drug dealing. The decision to raid the Paz home, according to
Ankeny, was made after narcotics officers found some bills and Department of
Motor Vehicle records containing the family’s address among the possessions of
a drug suspect named Marcos Beltrán. Back in the 1980s, Beltrán had lived next
door to the Paz family and at one point, they agreed to let Beltrán receive
mail in their home. So in other words, El Monte officers conducted a
commando-style raid on the Paz home based on the fact that a drug suspect (who
was out on bail and hadn’t been convicted) had received some mail in their home
during the previous decade.
The Rev. Accelyne Williams was no
drug dealer. In fact, the 75-year-old minister was a substance abuse counselor
in Boston and had a long history of doing good work in that city’s
African-American community. On March 25, 1994, Williams’ efforts to help a
substance abuser led to his death. That substance abuser was a police informant
who gave Boston narcotics officers the address of an alleged drug dealer who
lived in the same building as Williams, but a SWAT team raided the wrong
apartment—Williams’ apartment—and after being violently shoved onto the ground
and handcuffed, the minister began to vomit. Williams suffered a heart attack
and died.
Rev. Jonathan Ayers, a 28-year-old
Baptist minister from northern Georgia. Ayers who was white, did things to help
people. On September 1, 2009, he gave a woman named Johanna Jones Barrett $23
to help her pay her rent. Undercover narcotics officers who had been trailing
Barrett suspected that she was selling crack cocaine, and when Ayers gave her
$23, they began trailing Ayers. When Ayers left a gas station/convenience store
after using an ATM and saw three plainclothes officers pointing their guns at
him, he had no idea they were cops. Ayers, who obviously thought they were gang
members or carjackers, tried to escape but was shot and killed. Not
surprisingly, no drugs were found in either Ayers’ vehicle or on his dead body,
although one of the officers claimed that before the killing, Barrett had sold
him $50 worth of crack cocaine. Yeah and the moon is made of cheese.
On July 12, 1998, Houston
officers raided Navarro’s home based on an alleged drug user’s claim that
drugs were being sold there. A total of 30 bullets were fired, and Navarro was
shot 12 times. Officers claimed Navarro had a gun and fired at them, but
ballistics tests proved that all 30 shots were fired by the officers. The
officers who raided Navarro’s home violated department policy by failing to
obtain a search warrant. No illegal drugs were found in Navarro’s home, and
blood tests conducted after his death showed no traces of any illegal drugs in
his system.
In 2013, British police officers fired their
weapons only three times. The number of people fatally shot was zero. In 2012
the figure was just one. Even after adjusting for the smaller size of Britain’s
population, British citizens are around 100 times less likely to be shot by a
police officer than Americans. Between 2010 and 2014 the police force of one
small American city, Albuquerque in New Mexico, shot and killed 23 civilians;
seven times more than the number of Brits killed by all of England and Wales’s
43 forces during the same period.
Nearly two times a week in the
United States, a white police officer killed a black person during a seven-year
period ending in 2012, according to the most recent accounts of justifiable
homicide reported to the FBI. The reports show that 18% of the blacks killed
during those seven years were under age 21, compared to 8.7% of whites.
I believe that all police officers
should be required to wear small video body cameras secured to their lapels so
that their supervisors, the courts and the public can see what really happens
in these senseless shootings. I also feel that heavy sentences should be given
to police officers if they negligently shoot citizens. In Canada, a conviction
of negligence causing death can be punishable with a minimum of 20 years in
prison in prison. Perhaps if more of these kinds of sentences were given to
police officers who negligently shoot a suspect or innocent person to death,
there would be less people being shot by bad cops.
No comments:
Post a Comment