Dangerous dogs (Part 1)
I can appreciate why people love having dogs as pets, but it is beyond my
understanding as to why they would want to keep a dangerous dog as a pet in
their homes especially when they have small children living with them.
On June 11th
2013, in the British town of Mountsorrel, Lexi Hudson, a four-year old girl lived with her mother. The little
girl was
mauled to death by
the family`s pet dog. The dog was a French mastiff that was much bigger than the little girl. A fully grown
French mastiff weighs a minimum 110 pounds (49.9 kilograms).
Lexi took a midday nap after being
off school sick.
The normally placid French mastiff suddenly leapt at
the sleeping four-year-old, grabbed her in its jaws and began shaking her like
a rag doll. Lexi's horrified mother Jodi, 31, who was
comforting the youngster in their shared bed, frantically wrestled with the dog
to try to get it off her. Finally she ran to the kitchen to grab a knife. When
she returned to her bedroom, she stabbed the dog to death. Unfortunately it was
too late to save Lexi, who died from her injuries after being rushed to
hospital.
Lexi`s mother was told that the
dog was safe around kids so she brought it to their home. The hallmark of French mastiffs is their calm and dependable nature. They are not listed as a
dangerous dog. So why did this particular dog attack the little girl?
These dogs are very capable guard dogs with their sheer size
and strength backed by their courage and their natural protective instinct.
They are usually very calm and very affectionate to their masters. In my
opinion, the French mastiff that killed Lexi was more familiar with Lexi’s
mother and if the dog saw Lexi suddenly
embrace her mother, the dog might have thought that the little girl was
attacking her mother, hence the attack against Lexi.
On February 11th 1914
in the British town of Blackburn, an 11-month-old girl died after being mauled
by a “vicious and terrifying” dog. The dog was a Bull mastiff.
These particular guard dogs weigh between
110 and 130 pounds (50 and 59 kg). Dogs
of this breed are natural guardians of their home and owners. No special guard
training is needed for a Bullmastiff to react appropriately if its family is
endangered. Though usually
mild-mannered, the powerful Bull mastiff is also serious and self-assured. He
is afraid of nothing, and once aroused will seldom back down. The Bullmastiff
has a docile, calm and independent temperament. It is a devoted dog and loves
human attention. It is always alert, reliable, observant and protective which
makes it a perfect watchdog.
The dog was a nightmare for neighbours and people were terrified of
approaching it in the street. It
previously mauled a neighbour's cat to
death. When the police arrived to rescue the baby, the dog was barking wildly
and they couldn't get inside so they had to wait quite a long time before
entering. The police in England don’t generally carry firearms with them. If
they did, they could have shot the dog.
The dog that was called Mulan had
been picked from a kennels for strays by Lexi's mother Jodi Hudson a few weeks
before. In my opinion, that is the worst way to choose a pet, especially when
there is a small baby in the house. The owner of those kinds of kennels would
have no way of determining the background of the dogs in their care since they
are separated from one another for obvious reasons. Bull mastiffs are better suited in a home
without young children'', because of its size, however in this [articular dog,
staff at the kennel described the animal's temperament as being 'very friendly.
How would they know?
The death of the baby was an
absolute tragedy that should never have happened since there had been plenty of
warning signs of the danger of the dog in the past while in the Hudson’s home.
On the 11th of December 2013, a woman in West Yorkshire, in England who was the mother of four
children was savaged to death by her two pet dogs. The dogs were American pit pull Terriers.
Their weight is 25–35 pounds (11–16 kg).
The breed is banned in the United Kingdom, in the Canadian province of Ontario and in many locations in the United States.
in Fort St. John, in the Province of British Columbia,
Canada, two dogs had entered
the trailer home of Wendy Lee Baker, a 51-year-old woman and killed her cat and
were mauling her and her partner,
55-year-old Robin Elgie. The dogs ripped their cat to pieces, they
chased Lee around inside the laundry room and bedroom biting her multiple
times. They then proceeded to attack Robin. The dogs chewed both of
Robin’s arms to shreds.
Once inside, the Federal RCMP police
officers found Wendy Baker suffering from 100 dog bites and Robin Elgie sitting
unresponsive in a chair, appearing to be in shock, while being attacked by the
dogs. The officers tried everything that they
could to distract the dogs, to draw their attention away, but they still kept
attacking this man. They shot one dog, but the other
managed to escape with serious injuries, although it was later tracked down and
“humanely put down,”
Lee was released from hospital but has some major
healing to do, both physical and mentally.
A GoFundMe page, launched in support of
Elgie and his girlfriend, has raised more than $22,000 that was used to cover
the expenses incurred re their injuries.
The officers said they had a good idea who owned
the animals but were still trying to figure out why the dogs were loose
and what led to the vicious attack. Alas, I can’t find anything more about the
dogs and the owner of the dogs. If the
owner is found, he or she will be charged with letting the two dogs free to
roam. Further, that person can be sued for a great deal of money.
On January 1st, 2016 in
Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, a
woman was bitten more than 100 times while protecting her 3-year-old nephew
from a vicious dog. She was in critical condition following the second such dog
attack to take place in British Columbia within a week.
The 21-year-old woman was
covered in blood while she was fending off a large Rottweiler-pit bull cross on
an outdoor field. The toddler was unharmed but the boy’s aunt and a passerby
were injured while trying to rescue the boy. The two women were taken to
hospital. The boy’s aunt
had to undergo surgery after suffering dozens of bites, a broken arm and a
detached bicep.
The RCMP said the dog
belonged to the aunt’s boyfriend. What kind of jerk owns such a dog? A very stupid fool. I hope the aunt has
broken off that relationship. No doubt, the man was charged.
Rottweilers and pit-bull dogs
are both very dangerous dogs, but when they are the mixture of those two kinds
of dogs, they are really dangerous.
Rottweilers
These dogs are often used as guard dogs. The weight of these
dogs are generally between 50 and 60 kg (110 and 132 lbs) for males
and 35 and 48 kg (77 and 105 lbs) for females.
They
are potentially dangerous dogs which usually results from irresponsible
ownership caused by abuse, neglect, or lack of socialization and training.
According
to a study by the Centers for
Disease Control into fatal dog attacks on humans between 1979 and 1998,
Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs were responsible for
more than half (67%) of all deaths. In the years from 1993 to 1996 Rottweilers
were responsible for half of all deaths. They concluded that "fatal
attacks on humans appear to be a breed-specific problem (pit bull-type dogs and
Rottweilers.
A pit bull is defined as:
A pit bull terrier
A Staffordshire bull terrier
An American Staffordshire terrier
An American pit bull terrier
A dog that has an appearance and physical
characteristics substantially similar to any of those dogs.
Contrary to popular myth, Pit bulls do not have “locking jaws”
There is no physiological "locking mechanism" in the jaw muscle and
bone structure of pit bulls or other dogs. But Pit bulls are dangerous dogs
because they can
a bite, hold, and shake their victims and at times refuse to release their
victims with their strong jaws. Pit bull bites are particularly serious because
they tend to bite deeply and grind their molars into tissue.
Courts in the United States and Canada have ruled that expert
identification, when using published breed standards, is sufficient for the enforcement
of breed-specific legislation Approximately
550 jurisdictions have enacted breed-specific legislation (BSL) in response to a number of
well-publicized incidents involving pit bull-type dogs, and some government
organizations such as the U.S. Army and Marine Corps have taken administrative action as
well. These actions range from outright bans on the possession of pit bull-type
dogs, to restrictions and conditions on pit bull ownership. They often
establish a legal presumption that a pit bull-type dog is prima facie a legally "dangerous" or
"vicious" dog In
response, 16 states in the U.S. prohibited or restricted the ability of municipal governments within those states to enact BSL
In June 2016, Christine Vadnais, was found dead
in the backyard of her Montreal, Quebec home with a neighbour's dog mauling her
body. Police at the time said the dog was a Pit
bull. The neighbor was charged with negligence
causing death for letting the dogs run freely.
in October 14th 2015,
at the entrance to an apartment building in the Ahuntsic-Cartierville
district of Montreal, Nancy Martel was holding the door
open for a woman and her Pit bull when the dog lunged for Nancy’s
leg, biting her and dragging her down onto the steps outside. She was left with
deep gashes on her leg. The woman who owned the dog had a leash on the dog but
couldn’t control it. The dog should have been muzzled. The owner of the dog
insisted that her dog not be euthanized. This terrible woman was more
interested in the welfare of her dangerous dog than the welfare of human
beings.
Bessie Flowers, 86,
died from neck and head wounds after being attacked by American two Pit bulls
belonging to the woman’s daughter. She was visiting her daughter in Charlotte, North Carolina, when she tripped
and fell over in the back yard. The
police say that the animals started playing with her before turning aggressive.
Neighbors say authorities were warned earlier about the two dogs, but took no
action. In my opinion, both the dead woman’s daughter who owned the two
dangerous dogs and the authorities who did nothing, after hearing the
complaints about the two dogs are jointly responsible for the woman’s death.
In Toronto, a
woman left her apartment and suddenly, two Pit bulls who were in the hallway,
(and belonged to a neighbour) attacked the woman and killed her.
Doctors are optimistic they won’t
have to amputate the arm of a woman who was mauled by a pit bull-type dog on July
26, 2016, says her daughter, who owns the dog.
The attack occurred despite a province-wide ban on new pit bulls that
was instituted in 2005, Neighbours of
the family said that the dogs are a very common sight in Vaniere, Ontario. That
implies that they were running wild on the streets.
There was a horrible incident where a Pit
bull mauled someone very seriously in Toronto in 2004 so I wrote a letter to the premier of Ontario
insisting that he bring in a law prohibiting pit bulls being owned by anyone in
Ontario. He wrote me back and said that he had forwarded my letter to the
Attorney General of the province with instructions to proceed in drafting such
a law.
This is a letter I sent to the Premier of Ontario
on August 30th 2004.
Dear Sir:
Dear Sir:
Ontarians are facing and have been facing for a very long time, a very serious problem with respect to dangerous dogs.
The universally recognized dangerous dogs are; Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, Husky breeds, Staffordshire, Bull Terrier, German Sheppards, Tosa Inu and Dobermans.
In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that 25 breeds of dogs were involved in 238 fatal dog bites from 1979-1998. More than 50% of the deaths where the breed was known were caused by Pit Bull type dogs and Rottweilers.
I don’t have statistics for Canada or Ontario however it must be apparent to you as it is to everyone else that we really do have a very serious problem in Ontario as it relates to dangerous dogs.
I think it is time to get rid of these dogs by phasing them out.
The United Kingdom has taken steps to solve their problem. In 1991, their parliament passed the Dangerous Dogs Act.
1.—(1) This
section applies to—
(a) any dog of the type known as the pit bull terrier;
b) any dog of the type known as the Japanese tosa; and
(c) any dog of any type designated for the purposes of this section by an order of the Secretary of State, being a type appearing to him to be bred for fighting or to have the characteristics of a type bred for that purpose.
(2) No
person shall—
(a) breed, or breed from, a dog to which this section applies;
(b) sell or exchange such a dog or offer, advertise or expose such a dog for sale or a gift;
(d) allow such a dog of which he is the owner or of which he is for the time being in charge to be in a public place without being muzzled and kept on a lead; or
(e) abandon such a dog of which he is the owner or, being the owner or for the time being in charge of such a dog, allow it to stray.
3.—(1) If a dog is dangerously out of control in a public place—
(a) the owner; and
(b) if different, the person for the time being in charge of the dog is guilty
of an offence, or, if the dog while so out of control injures any person, an
aggravated offence, under this subsection.
I think it is time to bring in legislation to solve this problem. If not, then many more people in our province will eventually be maimed and killed by these dogs.
On your website, you have said, and I quote;
Our government is working with Ontarians to deliver real, positive change. We’re listening to Ontarians about where they want to go — and we’re leading the way there.
I think if you bring in legislation that prohibits the breeding of dangerous dogs in Ontario, your government will deliver a real, positive change to Ontarians.
Do you have the courage to bring in such legislation? If not, then your statement that you are listening to Ontarians is a farce. If another child dies because of an attack by a dangerous dog, that child will have died because we don’t have legislation in
Yours truly
Dahn Batchelor
After he read my letter, he wrote me back and said
that he would pass it on to the Attorney General of Ontario. Within months, the
Attorney General brought a bill before the legislature and the majority of the
members brought in a ban on
pit bulls in 2005.
Anyone having a pit
bull at the time of the ban could keep it, as long as the dog was sterilized
and muzzled and kept on a leash while in public. Further, the only legal pit
bulls in the province would be those who are over the age of age 11.
The law
prohibits pit bull terriers, Staffordshire bull terriers, American
Staffordshire terriers, American pit bull terriers or any dog that “has an
appearance and physical characteristics substantially similar to any of those
dogs. The general term is “pit-bull type. The law also states;
6. Except
as permitted by this Act or the regulations, no person shall,
(a) own a pit bull;
(b) breed a pit bull;
(c) transfer a pit bull, whether by sale,
gift or otherwise;
(d) abandon a pit bull other than to a
pound operated by or on behalf of a municipality, Ontario or a designated body;
(e) allow a pit bull in his or her
possession to stray;
(f) import a pit bull into Ontario; or
(g) train a pit bull for fighting
The Ministry of the Attorney
General’s office notes the legislation also applies to any dog that poses a
danger to the public and also said in 2005, that the ministry heard very
clearly from Ontarians that they wanted to be protected from pit bulls.
Pit bull dogs born before 2005 are exempt from Ontario’s ban but the owners
must adhere to section 6.
Years before that, I wrote our alderman a
letter complaining about dogs running wild on our streets. I suggested that the
city needed a bylaw prohibiting dogs running wild. He wrote me back saying that
he wasn’t going to ask the city to bring in such a bylaw as there were already
too many bylaws in the city.
His letter pissed me off. That was a big
mistake on his part. I have lived by a policy that I have had all my life since
I was a child. “Don’t fuck me unless you kiss me first.” This dummy didn’t kiss
me so I decided to punish him and punish him I did.
It was at a time when there were two
elections about to take place. They were provincial and municipal. He was
running for both. Wherever he went to give a speech, I attend the venue and I
asked him the following question. “If you get elected as our alderman and you
are also elected as a member of the legislature, which one of us will you
desert since you can’t serve both of them at the same time?
I will never forget the anger directed to him
at those meetings after he replied, “I have the right to run for two
offices.” H lost both elections by a
very large margin.
Many years ago when I was serving court
documents as a process server, I stepped onto the porch leading to the front
door of a house. Suddenly, a black mid-sized dog (I can’t remember the breed)
that was unseen by me on the porch, lunged at my left knee and bit it. It left
a fairly large gash.
It was at that moment that a fat black woman
opened the door and said angrily, “WHAT DO YOU
WANT?”
I handed her the court document then I told
her that her dog had just bitten me. She
replied angrily. “You shouldn’t have been on my porch in the first place.”
Ohh. That poor stupid woman. She didn’t know
what I do to fools who pisses me off.
While I sat in my car, I called the police. An officer arrived and I told him what had occurred. He knocked on her door but she didn’t answer it. He called the station and got her phone number and called her. He told her that if she doesn’t answer the door, he would force his way into the house. She opened the door. He charged her with having a dangerous dog. He also told her to put the dog on a leash.
The next day I approached the dog that was then
on a leash. It jumped into the air towards me with its teeth bared. At the
trial, I showed the justice of the peace the photo of the angry dog lunging at
me.
After the stupid dog owner stepped into the witness box, she said, “I have turned the dog over to the pound.” The JP asked the officer to call the pound to verify her statement. He did and returned to the court and said, “She did take it to the pound and told the people there that she would be taking the dog back later in the afternoon.” The case was adjourned for a week.
The following week, she and I attended court
again. She testified that she asked the pound to put the dog down. The JP asked
the officer to call the pound again and verify her statement. The officer made
the call and then said to the JP. “Sir. The dog has been euthanized.” The judge said something that made everyone
in the court room laugh. He said, “If for some miraculous reason that dog
becomes alive again, I will give you a two-thousand dollar fine.”
As I and the woman left the courtroom, she
turned to me and said angrily, “I will have my lawyer sue you for thousands of
dollars.”
When I was a very small child, my mother said
to me, “Danny. There are only two things you should never be afraid of. They
are the bogeyman and lawyers.” I said to
the woman as she was leaving the courthouse. “You tell your lawyer, if you
really have one, that I eat lawyers for breakfast.” Needless to say, I never got a call from her
so-called lawyer.
If that stupid woman had apologized to me and
offered to get me a band aid, I would have forgiven her and her dog. Instead,
she fucked me and didn’t kiss me and you know what I do to people who make that
cardinal mistake. Her outrageous conduct resulted in her having her dog put
down.
Since
Ontario’s Pit bull ban came into effect ten years earlier, fewer of those Pit
bull dogs are in the province, resulting in less vicious attacks by Pit bulls.
What I would like to see done is the
following.
1. Define
any dog as a DANGEROUS DOG that has seriously bitten a human being or another
animal with the seriousness of the bite to be determined by a court or other
municipal authority.
2. The
owner of such a dog if allowed to keep it; must place a sign that is no smaller than
eight inches by sixteen inches with the words DANGEROUS DOG on it on the lawn
of the property the dog resides at. If the owner of the dog resides in a
townhouse or an apartment and is permitted to keep the dog in such premises,
the owner must place a sign that is no smaller than six inches by twelve inches
with the words DANGEROUS DOG on it on the door.
3. Any dog that is classified as a DANGEROUS
DOG must have a bright red dog collar around its neck.
4. If
a DANGEROUS DOG is placed in a back yard, it must be leashed and if not leashed,
a fence must be erected that is not lower than six feet.
5. If
a DANGEROUS DOG is taken for a walk, it must be leashed and the leash must not
be longer than six feet.
6. If
a child takes a DANGEROUS DOG for a walk, the child must weigh no less than
fifty pounds more than the weight of the dog.
7. If
a dog attacks a human being and seriously injures that person, the dog must be
euthanized.
8. The
owner of a DANGEROUS DOG who fails to abide by Rules one through six will
receive a fine of no less than one thousand dollars.
The cities of Calgary, Alberta and Burnaby,
British Columbia, have similar by-laws.
Such by-laws will in my opinion, reduce the
number of dog bites by Dangerous Dogs.
No comments:
Post a Comment