Was the shooting of the black man justified?
Philando
Divall Castile, a black man, aged 32 graduated from Saint
Paul Central High School in 2001 and worked for the Saint
Paul Public School District from 2002 until his death. Philando
began working as a nutrition services assistant at Chelsea Heights Elementary
School and Arlington
High School (now Washington Technology Magnet School). He was promoted to
nutrition services supervisor at J. J. Hill Montessori Magnet School, in August 2014. Prior to the
shooting, Philando was stopped by the police 52 times for minor traffic
infractions. Other than that, he was an upright citizen.
On July
6th 2016 while in Falcon
Heights, a suburb of St. Paul, Minnesota Philando was
driving his car with his girlfriend and her small daughter as passengers when Jeronimo Yanez, a St.
Anthony, Minnesota police officer and another police
officer (Joseph Kauser) signaled him to pull over which Philando did.
Both officers had been with the
St. Anthony Police Department for four years at the time of the shooting, and were longtime friends who had
graduated together from the Minnesota State University, Mankato police academy in 2010. They are two officers of the 23
police officers working in that Police Department.
According to a police dispatcher audio obtained by the media, one of the two St. Anthony
police officers patrolling Larpenteur Avenue radioed to a nearby squad that he
planned to pull over the car and check the IDs
of the driver
and passenger, saying, "The two occupants just look like people that were
involved in a robbery. The driver looks more like one of our suspects, because
of the wide-set nose.”
Does that stupid police officer
know just how many blacks there are in the United States and elsewhere who have
a wide-set nose? Millions. Does having a wide-set nose by itself justify
believing that someone committed a robbery.
Further, the St. Anthony police
had sent out photos of a July 2 gas station robbery in nearby Lauderdale
through the Minnesota Crime Alert Network. It described two men with
dreadlocks robbing a gas station with handguns. Philando didn’t have dreadlocks that time in
is life.
Officer Yanez approached the car from the
driver's side, while officer Kauser approached it from the passenger side.
The stop took place on Larpenteur Avenue at Fry Street, just outside
the Minnesota
state fairgrounds, at about
9:05 p.m.
At some point in the next 103
seconds—which are not covered by the audio—Yanez fatally shot Philando. WHY?
In the video, Yanez asked Philando for his license and registration.
Philando told him that it was in his wallet. He also said that he had a pistol
on him and that he was licensed to carry it.
Making that statement was the
dumbest thing he ever did in his life. It got him killed. The officer didn’t ask him to empty his
pockets. He only asked him for his licence and registration of his car.
When Philando reached into his
pocket to get his ID, the officer was in my opinion, legitimately alarmed so he
yelled, “DON’T MOVE!” Obviously the officer couldn’t be sure if Philando was
going to pull out his ID or his handgun.
Now here is where the shooting becomes questionable. According to
Reynolds, her boyfriend put both of his hands upwards. Yanez shot
Philando in the arm four times. It
was the same arm that Philando was using to reach for his ID.
On the video, Reynolds says
"Please don't tell me he's dead," while Yanez exclaimed: "I told
him not to reach for it! I told him to get his hand open!"
According to police and emergency
audio of the aftermath obtained by the Star
Tribune, at 9:06 p.m., Officer Kauser called in the shooting,
reporting: “Shots fired. Larpenteur and Fry.” The dispatcher states,
"Copy. You just heard it?" Yanez exclaims, “Code three!” Many officers then rush to the scene. One
officer reported. “One adult female being taken into custody. Driver at
gunpoint. Juvenile female, child, is with another officer. We need a couple
other squads to block off intersections." Another officer called in,
"All officers are good. One suspect that needs medics.”
Reynolds, was taken into custody
and interrogated at a police station then released the following morning
around 5:00 a.m.
Reynolds later said that officers
had failed to check her boyfriend for a pulse or to render him first aid, and instead comforted the crying
officer who fired the shots. Reynolds stated that Philando received no medical
attention at all until the paramedics arrived more than ten minutes after the
shooting.
If this is so, then the officers were in the wrong.
If they had placed a tourniquet around Philando’s arm, he wouldn’t have bled to
death. The inaction of the police officers at the scene was a sign of complete
indifference to the survival of the stricken man which tells you something of
their character which in my opinion; was rotten to the core.
The Hennepin
County Medical Examiner's office ruled
Philando Castile's death a homicide and said that he had sustained multiple gunshot wounds. The
office reported that he died at 9:37 p.m. in the emergency room of the Hennepin
County Medical Center, about 20 minutes after being shot.
There is no doubt in my mind that
by the time the ambulance had arrived, it would have been too late to save the
man.
Following Philando’s death, the video had been viewed nearly
2.5 million times on Facebook. On July 14, Philando was buried following a
funeral service at the Cathedral of Saint Paul, attended by thousands of
mourners, diverse in race, gender and age. In my opinion, the fact that a great
many white people attended the funeral is evidence that they believed that
Philando died needlessly at the hands of Yanez.
Yanez and his partner Kauser were
placed on paid administrative
leave
which is generally standard practice in police forces.
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension (BCA) was the lead agency in charge of the investigation.
Under Minnesota state law, the
names of carry permit holders are not public records, and state officials have thus
not confirmed whether Philando had a permit. That is a really dumb law. If gun
permits were on record, the police could have originally confirmed if Philando
was licenced. if it was determined that he had no permit, then they would have
grounds to arrest him for carrying an unregistered firearm. In any case, that
is academic since Philando stated that he was licenced and was shot anyway.
Two days following the shooting,
Ramsey County Attorney John Choi called for a “prompt and thorough”
investigation into the shooting. He
said that he had not determined whether he would use a grand jury, but stated
that if either a grand jury or prosecutors in his office determined that
charges were appropriate, he would “prosecute this case to the fullest extent
of the law.
I have my doubts that Yanez would
be convicted if the matter went to trial since in my opinion, he probably
feared for his life if he really thought that that Philando was really pulling
his gun out of his pocket immediately after Yanez ordered him to not make a
move. If Philando had not told the officer that he had a gun in his pocket in the
first place, the officer would not have panicked and shot Philando if he saw
the butt of the gun in Philando’s hand.
On July 9th, Yanez's
attorney, Thomas Kelly of Minneapolis, said his client "reacted to the
presence of that gun and the display of that gun" and that the shooting
"had nothing to do with race. This had everything to do with the presence
of a gun.” This could mean that Philando was pulling the gun out to give to
Yanez.
Can anyone with a functioning mind
really blame Yanez for shooting Philando after he saw Philando pulling the gun
out of his pocket if that is what had really happened?
If Yanez actually thought Philando
was a robbery suspect, then the right practice of the police would be to
make a "felony traffic stop which
would involving bringing the suspect out at gunpoint while other officers are
in a position of cover and having the suspect lie on the ground until they can
identify who that individual really is.
Considering that Yanez stated that
he thought that Philando was a robbery suspect, he went about the wrong way to
approach the man whom he suspected was a robbery suspect. If he had done it the
right way, Philando would be alive today.
Demanding ID from a robbery
suspect while standing next to the man in his car is a sign of absolute
stupidity. What would looking at the ID help the officer to confirm one way or
another that the suspected man was a robber?
Reynolds, Philando’s girlfriend
had said they were told that they were stopped because of a broken tail light
which acc0rding to the victim’s girlfriend really wasn’t broken.
I believe that Yanez stopped
Philando’s car merely to be a nuisance since the two adults in the car were
black. Racial profiling has been a concern in the State of Minnesota. This
explains why Yanez exclaimed “Fuck” right after he shot Philando. He knew this
catastrophe occurred because he had initially made a nuisance of himself when
he stopped the car in the first place for no real legitimate reason.
Was it possible that Yanez was
aware that Philando frequently
made comments about social justice. For example, he posted a photo of the Black
Panther Movement and wrote, “BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!” In another post, he
passed on a Tupac Shakur quote, “They got money for wars but can’t feed the poor.”
He also wrote: “GOD IS GOOD!!!! ALL THE TIME !!!!!!” In
another post he said, “They criminalize the black lifestyle !!!!” This is a
reoccurring theme in his writings: “We We still slaves to the system !!!!!!” In another
post he wrote, “U GOIN TO JAIL NOW !!!!!” to which a friend commented, “You
must’ve watch that Video of the bus driver Knockin that Girls Head off … Lol.”
Governor Mark Dayton has subsequently released a statement calling for an investigation by
the U.S. Department of Justice. He said, “I extend my deepest condolences to the family, friends, and
community of Philando Castile. Our state today grieves with them. This morning,
I spoke by phone with White House Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough to request
that the U.S. Department of Justice begin an immediate independent federal
investigation into this matter.”
I don’t think the governor would
offer condolence and go so far as to ask for an investigation by a federal
department if he didn’t think that Yanez had acted improperly.
I will keep you informed as an
UPDATE when this matter is finally put to rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment