THE SHAFIA HONOR MURDERS (part 2)
As I mentioned in Part 1 of this three-part series, this is a
very long article for you to read in these two parts but as you read it, you
will be fascinated at how and why three members of a family murdered four of
their own family members. I got the information from a past edition of Mcleans
Magazine that had written a very large article about the murders. I have
written my own version of the events with the Maclean`s article and other
sources as a guide.
The murders
The four murders of the three
girls and Rona, (the first wife of Shafia) were carried out by the girl’s
father, his second wife, Tooba and their son, Hamid during a family road trip.
The exact details remain unclear, but it seems as though the four women were
incapacitated.
The exact location where they were murdered
remains a mystery, but somewhere at a secluded area,, the three women and child
were held underwater, one by one, until they stopped moving. Three of them (all
but Sahar) had bruises on the top of their heads, suggesting some kind of blow
in those final moments. Dead, or at least unconscious, the bodies were piled
back inside the Nissan, the front seats having been reclined.
The idea of the murderers was to stage a traffic
accident that was to convince the cops that they were dealing with a tragic,
late-night joyride. But as one of them drove the car to its final resting
place, doubt in the murderer’s minds must have crept in. Just to reach the
water’s edge, the Nissan had to jump a high curb, drive across some grass, make
a hard left around a rock outcropping, then a quick right around a narrow wall.
The police were obviously suspicious since the route looked nothing like it had
been a split-second wrong turn.
Once
in position, the driver left the engine running, got out, reached through the
open driver’s side window, and moved the gear shift into first while assuming,
on its own power, that the car would plunge over the concrete lip and into the
water.
It
didn’t happen that way. The front wheels went over the ledge, but nothing else.
The car teetered in the night, tires spinning, engine running with the four
bodies still inside. The plan was flawed from the beginning and to the
murderers; they were now in a crisis mode.
One
of the three reached through the driver’s side window and turned off the
ignition. But the bigger problem remained, dangling in plain sight. They had
only one choice: drive the Lexus behind the car, and ram the Nissan the rest of
the way.
The evidence of the murders
The
collision shattered the SUV’s left headlight, leaving bits of plastic scattered
on the ground. Before speeding away, the killers scrambled to pick up each of
the broken shards. They didn’t get them all.
The police found the rest of the plastic shards on the ground. The
location of the shards placed the murderer’s car where the car began pushing
the victim’s car into the water.
Hamed called the police that morning-from Montreal. At 7:55
a.m., just hours after the Nissan sank into the water. He did this because he had to explain to the
police why his car had a broken left headlight. He told them that he had a
single-car fender-bender in an empty parking lot near their house. He told the
responding cop that he accidentally smashed the left front end of the Lexus
into a yellow utility pole.
This stupid young man was too ignorant to come up with a
better explanation with respect to the broken left headlight. If he was telling
the truth, there would be plastic shards at the yellow utility pole near his
home and not at the crime scene.
At 8:30 in the morning, he phoned the Kingston East Motel and
spoke to his father. Then he dialled Sahar’s cell, knowing full well it was
submerged in the canal. The call went
straight to voice mail. He phoned again.
He did this in an intent to convince the police that he believed that she was
still alive. By then, Hamed was behind the wheel of the family’s green Pontiac
minivan, speeding back to Kingston to pick up his father and mother.
He was in such a rush to switch the cars and stage a bogus
accident—he stupidly took everyone’s luggage, including his mother’s purse,
with him to Montreal. Now since his mother was still in Kingston, why would he
have taken his mother`s purse to Montreal? Professional killers don’t make
blunders—amateurs do.
Back at the motel, Hamed
and his parents initiated the next phase of their plan—the necessary missing
persons report. They walked into the Kinston police headquarters just after 12
o’clock.
Why
did they walk to the police headquarters? They had two cars and although one
was in the canal, the other one Hamed had driven from Montreal was at the
motel.
Meanwhile,
at the locks, the police investigators were
already combing the scene, alerted to the sunken sedan by a Parks Canada
employee earlier that morning. It didn’t take long for police at the station to
make the connection. Escorted into a private room, the trio was told what they
already knew: their relatives were dead, discovered in a bizarre, watery grave.
The police interviews
At 3:45 p.m., Shafia sat down with Det.-Const.
Dempster for his tape-recorded interview. Composed and coherent, he talked
about his business interests overseas, the $2-million shopping mall in Laval,
and Zainab’s pending engagement plans. “It wasn’t a hundred per cent,” he
explained, his Dari answers translated by a Farsi interpreter (Farsi and Dari are essentially the same,
like British English and American English). Shafia also mentioned, without
being asked, that his kids liked to take a “turn on the car and take it away.”
That
must have appeared to the detective as a strange sudden switch in the
conversation. Shafia was obviously trying to convince the detective that his
daughters must have taken the car from the motel the previous night. That
doesn’t explain why his ex-wife was missing and in the car with his daughters
that sank in the canal.
Because Sahar spent so much of the journey
rifling off text messages, investigators were able to retrace the family’s
precise route, minute by minute, cell tower by cell tower. The route the
caravan was taking led them directly from Montreal to the canal.
As investigators discovered the real route that
the fatal car took, the detective got even more suspicious.
Shafia not realizing that the detective was suspicious at
what Shafia was telling him, he said they stopped in Kingston early that
morning because his wife, Tooba who was driving the Nissan, was feeling “dizzy”
and needed to sleep. So she waited-with his daughters and his first wife while
he and Hamed went searching for a place to sleep.
Shafia said, “When the Nissan rejoined us at the motel, Hamed
left for Montreal to work on the building or something and everyone else went
to bed. And that’s when Zainab and Sahar asked for the keys to retrieve some
clothes from the trunk.”
The
detective’s questioning was gentle but pressing however he
kept returning to a portion of the story that, two and a half years later was a key sticking point at trial. Where
did Tooba wait while Shafia was driving the Lexus while he looked for the
motel? And how did Tooba know where to meet them afterwards?
The truth, of course, is that the Nissan was at the locks
parking lot and never made it to the motel since it was then pushed into the
canal. But in order for Shafia to sell his
dubious story that Zainab, with no licence and no permission, took the car for
a deadly spin with her sisters and Rona he couldn’t tell the detective that it must
have gone to the canal. If he had done that, the next question would be, “Where
you at the canal when the Nissan was sinking in the canal?”
So when Dempster asked the obvious question (where did Tooba
wait for the Lexus driven by Shafia) He couldn’t tell the detective the truth because it was at the precise spot
where the Nissan and his daughters and first wife Rona were pushed into the
canal.
“How did your wife know which hotel to go to?” Dempster asked.
“You know, the distance was little,” Shafia replied.
Still puzzled, Dempster asked another obvious question. “What do
you think happened, Mohammad?” (Shafia’s
first name)
“I just woke up in the morning and didn’t see them, that’s it,” he
answered. “I don’t know anything else.”
“You know the car, your car, the Nissan, was found underwater,” he
continued.
“You said it,” Shafia answered.
“Any thoughts, any idea, how it got there?”
“No, no, no, not at all,” he said. “Because this is the first time
such an incident has befallen me.” As he left the interview room, Shafia
checked his watch.
Shafia’s son, Hamed didn’t need the interpreter. Fluent in English
and Dari, he looked like any other 18-year-old Canadian, with Air Jordan
warm-up pants and a mop of curly black hair. When Dempster asked if he wanted
some tea or coffee, he replied: “Oh no, it’s all good.”
Dempster
asked Hamed the same question he asked his dad: “Where did Tooba wait with the
Nissan?”
Hamed
replied, “I think it was at a McDonald’s or something,” He said. “I’m not
sure.”
Once
they reached the motel, Hamed said he plopped on a bed for a few minutes, just
long enough to hear Zainab ask for the keys to the Nissan. Then he got into the
Lexus and left for Montreal.
Why
Montreal? Hamed’s reasons ranged from “something personal” to “I forgot my
laptop” to sometimes “you don’t feel like staying at one place with your
parents, ya know?” Each new response only made Dempster that much more
suspicious.
The
detective must have wondered why the two suspects offered two different
explanations as to why Hamed drove back
to Montreal.
Hamed didn’t want to admit that his real purpose
was to smash the left headlight in Montreal so that the car wouldn’t be
connected with the Nissan being shoved into the canal.
The
detective asked point blank, “Hamed, do you know what happened to your
sisters?”
“No.”
“You
don’t?”
Still
doubtful, Dempster told Hamed about an eyewitness (an eight-year-old boy, as it
turned out) who had just spoken to an investigator on the scene. According to
his story, there were two cars at the water’s edge, but only one—the bigger
one-drove away. It was the Lexus.
“You
mean someone pushed them in?” Hamed asked.
Oh
Oh. That was a stupid answer. Up until that point, Dempster had never suggested
such a scenario.
“Hamed,
I think you know more than what you’ve told me here today.”
“I
have no idea,” Hamed answered. “You mean someone must have, uh, uh, together?
Must have come together with them?”
The detective had just heard the voice of a
drowning man trying to grasp a straw floating on the surface of the water and
just out of his reach.
“I’m not saying that a person caused it to happen,” Dempster said.
“I’m not saying they did it on purpose, but there is somebody out there that
knows what really happened and we need that person to speak up.” Hamed wasn’t
going to admit that he was that person.
Hamed
said he was “shocked” by the suggestion. “If I would have witnessed something,
I would be the first person to tell my mom and dad,” he insisted. “How would I
feel inside?”
Dempster
made it clear he wasn’t accusing anyone of anything. But just to be sure, he
said the Montreal police were going to swing by the house and take a peek at
the Lexus.
When
Tooba took her turn in the interview room, Dempster got right to the point.
“What I am trying to understand and I think what everyone wants to know, is how
the car got from the motel to the water.”
“”Can
I say (what happened)? “ she replied.
“Yes,
please.”
Tooba
said she was the one who drove the Nissan into Kingston, but was too “tired”
and “nauseous” to go any further. She parked (somewhere) and waited for the
others to find a place to sleep. “When they got the motel, they wanted, to come
to get me but I came myself. I was changing for bed, around 2 a.m., when Zainab
walked in and asked for the keys. I don’t understand what happened after that.”
With
Tooba’s three daughters dead, her life supposedly destroyed, she told her story
to the detective as if only the car was lost. No tears. No emotion. But she did
make sure to point out that her eldest daughter was in a “hurry” to get back to
Montreal. Tooba even claimed that Zainab didn’t have a licence, let alone
highway experience and yet was begging to drive during the trip back from
Niagara Falls. “She would do whatever she wanted to do,” Tooba said. “I think
she thought: ‘My mom and dad are asleep, let’s go for a drive and return.’ “
“Were
you there when the car went in the water?” Dempster asked, a few minutes later.
“No,
no, I wasn’t there,” she said.
The
detective then said, “If you were not there, my job is to find out what
happened, and tell you,” he continued. “As a parent, one parent to another, if
something happened to my child, I would want to know the truth.”
Tooba
nodded in agreement. “I would have told you everything, but I haven’t seen
anything,” she said. “If I knew I would have told you, and you could have
helped me.”
Dempster leaned in closer. “People have not
been truthful with us today.”
At
8:40 p.m., the sun setting over the crime scene, Hamed was back in the
interview room, arms folded. As promised, an investigator had contacted the
Montreal police and Dempster now knew about the single-car smash-up that
morning. He asked, “Why are you hiding that information from me, Hamed?”
His
answer was immediate: “If I would tell you, you would go tell my dad.”
Hamed
said he was on his way to grab some breakfast when he accidentally smacked a
pole, and just didn’t want his father to find out until after everyone got
home. “I don’t know where you’re going with this, honestly,” he said. “I didn’t
chase her, man.” (He was referring to the
other alleged driver)
“Did your dad
(find out)?” Dempster asked.
“No.”
The
detective asked, “Why were the girls cruising around the outskirts of Kingston
at two o’clock in the morning? Were they hungry? Scared? Sneaking back home? “
I don’t know, ya know?” Hamed said. “I want to
find this out as much as you.”
Out of
questions to ask Hamed, Dempster left him alone in the interview room. For
seven minutes, with the camera still rolling, the 18-year-old got a preview of
life inside a small space. He flexed his biceps, flipped through his wallet,
and picked his nose. He certainly was nervous at that time and for good reason.
In
Montreal, Ricardo Sanchez was dialling his phone, desperate to reach his
girlfriend, Sahar. He would call her number 22 times over the next three days,
each attempt forwarded to voice mail.
Part 3
will be published on Friday.
No comments:
Post a Comment