THE FATE OF A TEENAGE RAPE
VICTIM
If you click your mouse on the underlined words, you will get more information
If you click your mouse on the underlined words, you will get more information
Evelyn Beatriz Hernandez was handed a 30-year prison sentence
in 2017 for aggravated murder by a female judge who ruled the teenager had
induced an abortion, which is a crime under any circumstance in the Central American
nation.
Her sentence was annulled in February 2019 in an
appeal before El Salvador's top court, marking a victory for the Citizen Group for the Decriminalization of
Abortion who are working to free
another 20 jailed women with similar cases.
Abortion has been a crime since 1997 in the
socially conservative and Catholic majority nation, even in cases of rape and
incest, when the woman's life is in danger and even if the foetus is deformed.
Is bring a deformed child with no arms to birth a decent thing to bring about? How
would the other cope with the birth of that unfortunate woman?
Pro-choice activists say Hernandez's retrial is
an important test case that could signal the stance on abortion taken by El
Salvador's new president, Nayib Bukele, who took office in June 2019.
Bukele has said he believes abortion should be
allowed only if the mother's life is at risk." This case would be the first case that would be
tried after the new president is in power," said Paula Avila-Guillen,
director for Latin America initiatives at the Women's Equality Center, a U.S.-based reproductive rights advocacy
group.
Hernandez, now 21 and from a poor rural
community, said she was raped and did not realize that she was pregnant until
she went into labour in a bathroom and gave birth to a stillborn baby. Why was she charged if the baby was dead before it emerged from its
mother?
There was no proof that she tried to kill her
baby considering that she suffered a pregnancy-related complication. The irony in this case is that if she could afford
a doctor to assist her, she would have never been charged, let alone
imprisoned.
Six other countries in Latin America and the
Caribbean have absolute bans on abortion however. El Salvador stands out for
its high number of convictions. About 20 women are in jail for abortion crimes
when they suffered miscarriages, stillbirths or pregnancy complications, some
serving sentences of up to 40 years.
The United Nations called on El Salvador in 2017
to issue a moratorium on applying its abortion law and to review all cases
where women have been imprisoned for abortion related crimes. But attempts to
pass a bill that would ease El Salvador's abortion ban have failed. In my
opinion, the Catholic Church is behind this stupid law since that church has
always been against abortion for any reason whatsoever.
In that country, there's
no presumption of innocence. The moment that the word abortion gets thrown in a
case, from that moment on. These
unfortunate women are guilty in the eyes of everyone. Well probably not
everyone but certainly by Cath0lic prudes.
The United Nations called on El Salvador in
2017 to issue a moratorium on applying its abortion law and to review all cases
where women have been imprisoned for abortion related crimes. But attempts to
pass a bill that would ease El Salvador’s abortion ban have failed.
iIn 2016, there
were currently 66 countries that ban abortion
altogether (with a portion of those having
exceptions where abortion is okay to save a woman's life. Among those countries are
ones located in the Middle East, such as Afghanistan and Syria; some in Africa,
such as Sudan and Nigeria; and others located in South America, such as Brazil
and Chile. These 66 countries make up for a little over 25 percent of the
world's population.
In South
America, despite abortion being illegal in almost all countries within the
region (with the exception of Cuba), most allow criminal penalties to be waived or
lowered in specific circumstances such as when the pregnant woman is in danger
or when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest.
In Ireland, abortion is illegal and
only legal when a pregnant woman's life is at risk, including the risk of
suicide. The Irish Family Planning Association reports that every year, an
estimated that as many as 5,000 women travel abroad to access safe and legal
abortions.
Abortion is
also criminalized in most circumstances in Northern Ireland, leading Amnesty
International to claim in a statement last June that Ireland's abortion law is
"one of the most restrictive in the world." If
someone were to have an illegal abortion in Ireland or assist someone in having
one, they would face up to 14 years in prison and medical professionals could
face a €4,000 (about $4,352 USD) fine for giving women comprehensive
information about the procedures.
Abortion in Ireland is currently regulated by the Health
(Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy Act passed in 2018. Abortion is
permitted during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy, and later in cases where
the pregnant woman's life or health is at risk, or in the cases of a fatal
foetal (Stillborn).
The abortion debate
most commonly relates to the "induced
abortion" of an embryo or fetus at some point
in a pregnancy, which is also how the term is used in a legal sense.[6] Some also use the term
"elective abortion", which is used in relation to a claim to an
unrestricted right of a woman to an abortion, whether or not she chooses to
have one. The term elective abortion or voluntary abortion describes the
interruption of pregnancy before viability at the request of the woman, but not
for medical reasons
Abortion services
commenced on 1 January 2019 following its legalization by the aforementioned
Act, which became law on 20 December 2018. This law followed a constitutional
amendment approved by a referendum in May 2018.
This replaced the Eighth Amendment, which had given
the life of the unborn foetust he same value as
that of its mother, with a clause permitting the Oireachtas (parliament)
to legislate for the termination of pregnancies. The constitution amendment
was signed into law on 18 September 2018.
While the
laws and criminal penalties differed from country to country where abortion is
banned, many women still ended up behind bars as a
form of punishment. President Trump may have eventually backtracked on his
divisive comments and released a statement in which he clarified that he would
seek punishment for abortion providers and not the woman having the abortion),
but it's important the public keep the conversation in mind and not allow the
United States to become the next country ramping up its anti-abortion laws even
further.
After nearly four hours of debate, the
Alabama Senate passed HB 314, a bill that essentially outlaws all forms
ofabortion except in cases where
the mother’s life is at risk, or if the unborn baby is found to have a “lethal
anomaly. The bill makes no exceptions
for victims of rape or incest, despite Democrats’ attempts to reintroduce
such exceptions.
The new law would punish doctors with up to 99 years
behind bars — decades more than the maximum sentence for those convicted of
second-degree rape.
HB 314 is a near-total abortion ban. If enacted,
it will be the most draconian anti-abortion law in the United States. And in
the context of the national discussion about reproductive rights, the
implications of HB 314 could also be devastating. Proponents of the bill
(including the sponsor of HB 314 itself) have openly admitted that it is
intended as a direct challenge to Roe
v. Wade — and given the present composition of the Supreme
Court, the fear of the landmark ruling being overturned or dramatically eroded
is an all too valid one.
Abortion is among the
most controversial and divisive issues in the society, culture and politics of
the United States. Various anti-abortion
laws have been in force in each state since at least 1900.
Before the U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe
v. Wade decriminalized abortion nationwide in 1973, abortion was already
legal in several states, but the decision imposed a uniform framework for state
legislation on the subject. It established a minimal period during which
abortion is legal (with more or fewer restrictions throughout the pregnancy).
That basic framework, modified in Planned
Parenthood v. Casey (1992), remains nominally in place,
although the effective availability of abortion varies significantly from state
to state, as many counties have no
abortion providers.[1] Planned Parenthood v. Casey held
that a law cannot place legal restrictions imposing an undue burden for "the
purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman
seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus
The main actors in
the abortion debate are most often labeled either as "pro-choice" or "pro-life", though
shades of opinion exist, and most Americans are considered to be somewhere in
the middle.[3] A 2018 Gallup survey found the
percentages that were pro-choice or pro-life were equal (at 48%), but more
people considered abortion morally wrong (48%) than morally acceptable (43%).
The poll results also indicated that Americans harbor a diverse and shifting
set of opinions on the legal status of abortion. The survey found that only 29%
of respondents believed abortion should be legal in all circumstances, and 50%
of respondents believed that abortion should be legal under certain circumstances.[4] Recent polling results also
found that only 34% of Americans were satisfied with the current abortion laws.
Abortion in Canada is legal at all
stages of pregnancy and is governed by the Canada
Health Act. While some non-legal barriers to access continue to exist
Canada is one of only a few nations with no specific legal restrictions on
abortion. Regulations and accessibility vary between provinces. Prior to 1969,
all abortion was illegal in Canada. In 1969, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1968–69 legalized abortion for any
reason as long as a committee of doctors certified that continuing the
pregnancy would put the mother at risk. Of course, the abortion will not be
permitted if the pregnancy is in the third trimester stage unless the mother’s
life is at risk.
Long gone are the days in Canada when back room
quacks would abort the babies and at the same time, put the pregnant women’s
lives at risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment