ANOTHER MAN WAS CHOKED TO DEATH BY POLICE
If you click your
mouse on the underlined words, you will get more information.
Police in Oklahoma City released new videos this
week showing a handcuffed black man repeatedly begging for air
before dying at a hospital last year.
He called out, “I can’t
breathe," 42-year-old Derrick Scott, who was armed, told officers multiple
times — using the same final words uttered by George Floyd, Eric Garner and
other black men killed in police custody in recent years.
The latest videos, captured
by the officers’ body-worn cameras, were made public this week after demands
from the Oklahoma City Black Lives Matter group and local news outlets.
The disturbing footage has
raised questions about the officers’ response and whether they did enough to
try to save the suspect’s life.
“I don’t care,” one of the cops told Scott
after he pleaded for air.
“You can breathe just
fine,” said another.
Police were responding to a
report of a man brandishing a handgun near downtown Oklahoma City on May 20th,
2019, when they identified Scott as a possible suspect. But the an took off
running and struggled with the cops who were trying to arrest him, the videos
show.
The officers eventually
tackled the suspect, handcuffed him on the ground and found a loaded firearm in
his pocket, according to the videos.
After pleading that he
couldn’t breathe, Scott still tried to resist arrest before finally falling
unconscious.
The officers called for an
ambulance, but the father of two was pronounced dead a short time later,
Oklahoma Police Capt. Larry Withrow told reporters at a news conference .
An autopsy later determined
that the probable cause of death was a collapsed lung, with several
contributing factors, including physical restraint, asthma, recent
methamphetamine use and heart disease, local news station KFOR reported.
The medical examiner
declared the manner of death as “unknown” and said there was “no fatal trauma”
to Scott’s body, WI throw told reporters.
The officers were briefly
placed on administrative leave at the time, but a district’s attorney review of
the case cleared them of any wrongdoing.
The police
monitored his health throughout this incident and you can hear them
narrate on the video that he continued to have a pulse and he continued to be
breathing,” Withrow said.
Scott’s family and local activists are urging
authorities to re-open the investigation and fire and charge the officers
involved.
The Oklahoma incident is
similar to another 2019 fatal arrest that made headlines this week.
Authorities in Texas
also released a video this
week showing the final moments before a 40-year-old unarmed black man died in
police custody. Javier Ambler, who crashed his car after cops chased him over
his alleged failure to dim his vehicle’s bright lights in March 2019, was
repeatedly tased by sheriff’s deputies in Austin even after telling them he had
a heart disease and was struggling to breathe. He cried out. “Sir, I can’t breathe. Please Save me.” The
police didn’t save him and he died in thr hospital.
The police acted
illegally because choke holds by police are forbidden in New York City.
In December 1994: Anthony Baez was fatally choked by New
York Police Department officer Francis Livoti in the Bronx, following an altercation with
him. In June 1998, Livoti was convicted in a federal court on charges of violating
Baez's civil rights, and was sentence to prison. for seven and a half years.
In December 2006: Eugene
Ejike Obiora, a Nigerian-Norwegian student, was killed during an arrest
where Obiora had behaved aggressively toward personnel at the social services
office in Trondheim. Obiora died en-route to a
hospital after a police officer held him in a stranglehold. The case made headlines and
three officers were accused of racism and excessive use of force, but they were
cleared by police investigators and the chief prosecutor.
There are fifteen cities in the USA that permit police to use
choke holds. This may change soon.
Like Floyd,
Lyons was black. The officers met him with guns drawn and ordered him to face
the car, spread his legs, and place his hands on top of his head. Not long
after Lyons complained that a ring of keys that he held in his hands was
causing him pain, one of the officers wrapped his forearm around Lyons’s throat
and began to choke him. Lyons passed out. He woke up facedown on the ground,
covered in his own urine and feces. The officers released him with a citation
for the broken taillight.
Lyons brought
a federal lawsuit against the city and officers who assaulted him. But that
case, City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983), did not end well for him. Decades later,
the 5-4 decision of thr Supreme Court
still stands as one of the greatest obstacles to civil rights lawyers
challenging police brutality in cases like George Floyd’s.
As Justice
Thurgood Marshall wrote in his dissenting opinion, “The city instructs its
officers that use of a chokehold does not constitute deadly force.” unquote
Nevertheless, “no less than 16 persons have died following the use of a
chokehold by an LAPD police officer,” 12 of whom were black men.
According to Justice Marshall, “the evidence submitted to
the District Court established that, for many years, it has been the official
policy of the city to permit police officers to employ chokeholds in a variety
of situations where they face no threat of violence.”
When Lyons sued the city, he wanted more than just a sum of
money compensating him for his injuries. He sought an injunction — a formal
court order that would have forbidden the LAPD from using chokeholds “except in
situations where the proposed victim of said control reasonably appears to be
threatening the immediate use of deadly force.”
ut the Supreme Court held that Lyons could not obtain such
an injunction unless he could show that he was personally likely to be choked
by a Los Angeles police officer in the future. “Past exposure to illegal
conduct,” Justice Byron White wrote for the Court, does not permit someone to
seek an injunction. Rather, “Lyons’ standing to seek the injunction requested
depended on whether he was likely to suffer future injury from the use of the
chokeholds by police officers.”
When the US
Supreme Court turns its back on injustice, there are deadly consequences.
It didn’t matter that nearly a thousand other Los Angeles
residents were subjected to police chokeholds. To obtain a court order
protecting future victims of police violence from being choked, Lyons would
have to show that he was likely to be choked by an LAPD officer a second time.
White’s opinion went even
further than that. To obtain an injunction, White wrote for the Court, Lyons
“would have had not only to allege that he would have another encounter with
the police, but also to make the incredible assertion either (1) that all police officers in Los
Angeles always choke
any citizen with whom they happen to have an encounter, whether for the purpose
of arrest, issuing a citation, or for questioning, or (2) that the City ordered
or authorized police officers to act in such manner.”
As Justice Marshall
pointed out in dissent, Lyons made
it so difficult to obtain an injunction preventing police misconduct that “if
the police adopt a policy of ‘shoot to kill,’ or a policy of shooting 1 out of
10 suspects, the federal courts will be powerless to enjoin its continuation.”
Yons case did not foreclose lawsuits against
rogue cops altogether. Someone like Adolph Lyons (or, for that matter, George
Floyd’s survivors) may still sue cops who violate their constitutional rights,
and they may potentially receive monetary damages from those cops and their
police forces.
Of
course, cities can pass laws prohibiting police officers from using choke
holds. The question is, will they do
it?
The Atlanta police
officer who fatally shot Rayshard Brooks in a Wendy’s parking lot has been
fired — and could face a murder charge, prosecutors say. Garrett Rolfe, on the force since 2013, was
fired, and his partner, Devin Bronsan, was placed on administrative duty on the
early hours of June 14th. of Police Chief Erika Shields subsequently resigned from the police force.
Brooks,
27, was killed that Friday night during a struggle with the pair, who were e dispatched
after a Wendy’s customer reported that a man was sleeping in his car in the
drive-through. If the man was sleepy, why was it necessary to shoot him dead?
“Videos
indicate that during a physical struggle with officers, Brooks obtained one of
the officer’s Tasers and began to flee from the scene," the Georgia Bureau
of Investigation said in a statement.
"Officers
pursued Brooks on foot and during the chase, Brooks turned and pointed the
Taser at the officer. The officer fired his weapon, striking Brooks.” He should
have shot him in the leg instead.
The police officer who fatally shot a young
Black man suffering from schizophrenia at his family's home in Brampton, Ontario
in Canada in April of this year has not agreed to an interview, nor turned
over his notes to investigators of Ontario's police watchdog.
The Special Investigations Unit, a civilian
oversight body that investigates reports of deaths, serious injury or sexual
assaults involving police, said in a news release that the officer
involved in the shooting of D'Andre Campbell, whom it did not identify, cannot
be legally compelled to present themselvesfor an interview to the SIU,"
nor must they submit their notes. This cop can be fired from the police
department and the Crown attorney can
charge the officer with a crime related to the death of the black man.
It was D'Andre who called 911. He said he wanted to be taken to the
hospital," his mother Yvonne Campbell told The Fifth Estate's
Mark Kelley in a recent interview.
"He called out for help, and the system that was supposed to help
him failed him," his sister Shenika Malcolm told CBC News in the days
after his death. "There was no imminent threat and ... no de-escalation
methods." The SIU has said police were called to the family's Sawston
Circle home for a "domestic situation."
"There was an interaction which included the discharge of conducted
energy [Taser or Taser-like] weapons by two officers," according to
an SIU news release in the hours after Campbell's death. "One officer then
discharged his firearm multiple times. The man was struck. He succumbed to his
injuries at the scene."
The Fifth Estate reported that Campbell had been
struggling with his condition, and the family had called 911 a handful of times
in the past when they were concernedn captions on
In its news release, the SIU said investigators have interviewed
all four officers designated as witnesses to the incident, along with four
family members.
From the scene, investigators recovered a knife, two conducted energy
weapons and what they described as "firearm-related
evidence." The officer's firearm was also taken as part of the
investigation. "Many of these items" were submitted for forensic
analysis, the SIU said.
Asked what impact it would have on the investigation if the officer who
shot Campbell refuses to speak about the incident, an SIU spokesperson said,
"The more information the SIU gets during the course of its
investigation — whether it be interviews or evidence — the better the
SIU is able to determine what happened."
Meanwhile, Campbell's family has questions about the police
response on that April day, including why no crisis intervention team was sent
to the home. Peel Regional Police have said they are unable to answer that
question, citing the ongoing SIU investigation.
It is most unfortunate
that our cities are still plagued with rogue police officers.
No comments:
Post a Comment