A DANGEROUS OCCUPATION:
Making Rayon
For well over a century, viscose
rayon has been used to make clothes, tires, cellophane and everyday kitchen
sponges.
What makes regular pulp different
from dissolving pulp from wood which is the substance needed to make rayon is
an extra chemical process that removes hemicellulose. It is a weaker
polysaccharide inside the biological composition of the individual pulp cells.
By removing these weaker elements, this process ensures that the pulp has
higher cellulose content that is usually around 92 per cent. The result is regarded
in the pulp and paper industry as “specialty cellulose.
This substance is then pressurized
and put through a screening process where large fragments, knots, dirt and
other debris is removed. Once the rejected materials are removed, what remains
is pulp. The pulp is then washed to remove any further debris, bleached to
remove its colour and then steam-dried, packaged in the form of sheets.
What
makes regular pulp different from dissolving pulp (the substance needed to make
rayon) is an extra chemical process that removes hemicellulose – a weaker
polysaccharide inside the biological composition of the individual pulp cells.
By removing these weaker elements, this process ensures that the pulp has
higher cellulose content – usually around 92 per cent – so much so that it is
regarded in the pulp and paper industry as “specialty cellulose. ”Its
microbiological strength is what makes it perfect for creating rayon.
To
create the fiber, the cellulose has to be put through a series of chemical and
physical procedures. First, the cellulose is dissolved in sodium hydroxide
(also known as caustic soda) then the solution is pressed between rollers to
remove excess liquid. The pressed sheets are crumbled or shredded to produce
what is known as “white crumb.”
The white crumb is aged by
exposing it to oxygen, then mixed with carbon disulfide in vats under a
controlled temperature – usually around 20 to 30°C. This changes the chemical
makeup of the cellulose mixture and results in a product called cellulose
xanathate, or “yellow crumb.”
The
yellow crumb is then dissolved in a caustic solution and forms yet another
product called “viscose” because of its very high resistance to force – or –
viscosity. The viscose is set to stand for a period of time to “ripen,”
allowing the cellulose to regenerate when it’s finally formed into a filament.
After
it is ripened, the viscose is filtered to remove any un-dissolved particles,
degassed to remove any bubbles of air and put through a spinneret – a
multi-pored device that forms numerous individual filaments. As the viscose
exits the spinneret, it lands in a bath of sulfuric acid resulting in the
formation of rayon filaments. The rayon filaments are then stretched to straighten
out the fibers, washed to remove any residue chemicals and cut into spools and
– depending on the client’s wishes – dyed. Now the packages of the finished
product are to be shipped to its customers.
So, what is so dangerous about this during the manufacturing of rayon
and the cellophane?
The making of rayon is an
industrial hazard whose egregious history ranks up there with asbestos, lead
and mercury. The manufacturing of viscose rayon serves as a death sentence for many industry workers working in the plants manufacturing rayon.
There was a famous rubber factory
where they put bars on the second story windows because so many workers had a
tendency to jump out and kill themselves
rather than die slowly from the effects from the disclosure of the toxic fumes.
The key
ingredient in the making of viscose is a molecule called carbon disulfide — a
molecule so insidiously toxic that it devastated the minds and bodies of
factory workers for more than a century. Carbon disulfide can exist in
air as vapor. The way to protect workers is to issue them masks. Alas, many of
the manufactures in China, Japan and other countries prefer not to go to that expense. Rayon isny manufactured in the US or in Canada and other countries so that problem doesn't exist in those countries.
It
is pretty easy to recognize the toxic effects early on because it makes
workers insane. It has been found that about 30 per cent of the workers that were
investigated showed signs of serious poisoning.
Several epidemiology studies have reported
increased mortality among workers in viscose rayon plants who were
occupationally exposed to carbon disulfide as well as other chemicals.
Deaths have also been reported in a
community in India following an accidental release of large amounts of carbon
disulfide, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfuric acid from a viscose rayon plant. However,
no definitive or consistent conclusions can be drawn from these studies because
of concomitant exposure to other chemicals plus uncertainty about exposure
concentrations, and the likelihood of multiple routes of exposure.
In a 10-year (1975-1985) epidemiological
study of 251 workers exposed to carbon disulfide and 124 controls in two
viscose rayon factories in Czechoslovakia, increased in total and
cardiovascular mortality were noted in spinners exposed to high levels of
carbon disulfide. Although associated
levels of exposure were not quantified for this particular group, the study
authors of the report estimated that exposures ranged from less than 9.6 to 48
ppm. However, insufficient data were provided to fully support their
conclusions. An approximately 15% increase in deaths resulting from circulatory
disease was observed among Dutch viscose rayon workers exposed to carbon
disulfide concentrations which were described as “at least 7 ppm, and possibly
higher” The increased risk of dying from circulatory disease was greatest 20-30
years after the start of the exposure.
Following an accident involving a railroad
car, 27 individuals were exposed via inhalation to an unspecified concentration
of carbon disulfide. Subtle and transient changes in pulmonary function were
manifested as reduced vital capacity and decreased partial pressure of arterial
oxygen Dyspnea (shortness of breath) was reported in 77 of the 123 persons
following an accidental release of large amounts of carbon disulfide, hydrogen
sulfide, and sulfuric acid from a viscose rayon plant in India.
The
manufacturers from China and Japan say that the fabric continues to this day to
be "greenwashed" as an eco-friendly product. They omit entirely the
fact that you can't make the product without this toxic chemical. So the manufacturers
are lying to cover-up the fact that many pf their employees are suffering from
this deadly toxic.
As early as 1963, Lenzing started
recycling the chemicals from pulp production after the company switched from
the calcium bisulphite method to an environmentally friendly magnesium
bisulphite method. However, there are
many manufacturers of rayon. Even with
the advancements that have been made over time, most rayon manufacturing
processes in use today are not considered environmentally friendly.
Lyocell manufacturing, and Tencel
in particular, is an extremely environmentally friendly process and the most-friendly
of these three fibers. The revolutionary aspect of Tencel manufacturing is the
recovery and reuse of up to 99.8% of the solvent and the remaining emissions
are broken down in biological water treatment plants. In fact, the solvent is
not acidic. The harmlessness of the solvent has been proven in dermatological
and toxicological tests. One can put their bare hand in the solvent without
harm (although it’s probably not advisable to leave it there). Also, no toxic
substances remain in the fiber.
The other manufacturers have to an environmental friendly process if they want t save the wellbeing of their workers.
Consumers
aren't affected since there are no toxic vapors coming from the finished
products. For this reason, there's not very much impetus for outrage in
countries that have this problem if it's just the workers in the factories
making the finished product who suffer especially when the workers are not in
the US, Canada and other westernized countries. Occupational health and multinational corporations in other countries
who manufacture Rayon and other similar products have been aware of the
dangers, but motivated by indifference and that the factories make huge profits—both
have failed to act.
No comments:
Post a Comment