INNOCENT
JOGGER KILLED BY A COP
If you click your mouse on the underlined
words, more information will appear.
Ahmaud Arbery who was a
25-year-old black man was killed in 1974 while he was jogging in the early
evening through a Glynn County Georgia neighborhood on the wrongful suspicion
that he was a burglar. He was killed by a Memphis, Tennessee investigator and his son who both lived in the
neighbourhood.
The victim had been pursued by the two heavily bearded men in a
truck after the two men (a district attorney’s
investigator and his son) spotted him jogging
in their neighborhood. The black man was
unarmed when he was shot twice in his chest with a shotgun when he
paused after he came to a chain link fence, his empty hands visible to the men
who opened fire on him.
The two Georgia men
who were caught on video shooting the unarmed jogger to death February claimed
that they were chasing a suspect behind a series of burglaries in the area. But
a local police official said the last break-in the neighborhood was reported
nearly two months before the shooting. The last known burglary in the
neighborhood happened on January. 1, more than seven weeks before the Feb. 23
incident that ended Arbery’s life at the age of 25, Glynn County Police Lt. Cheri
Bashlor told CNN
Gregory McMichael and his son were originality cleared of any wrongdoing
because, at the time, it was lawful to shoot a fleeing felon except the jogger
wasn’t a fleeing felon.
It wasn’t until May 2020 that
the authorities, after public pressure realized
that there was some crooked dealings that let the two men off the hook for the
shooting of the blogger.
Gregory McMichael, a retired 64-year-old district attorney’s
investigator, and his 34-year-old son, Travis, were both arrested and charged
with the murder of Ahmaud Arbery
The father and son charged with murder in the high-profile Ahmaud Arbery case had a frontation with a young black man in the same Georgia neighborhood previously.w weeks before the fatal Feb. 23 shooting,
Georgia attorney
general has promised that his office will investigate ylocal authorities’ handling
of the death of Ahmaud Arbery with emphasis on the the role the dstrict attorney played in this case.
In the 1985 landmark case about
15 year old Garner’s killing, the Supreme Court ruled that you can’t shoot a
burglary suspect simply for running away. This ruling makes the responses to
Arbery’s killing even more atrocious. That he may have stopped at an unfenced
construction site before running on doesn’t justify anything that happened.
Arbery was unarmed, and the men who opened fire on him as he ran for his life,
Gregory and Travis McMichael, were vigilantes who assumed that a black man
running must be the criminal they were looking for and they chased him down in
a pickup truck.
The killers were a father and son team.
The father, 64, had served as a police officer and investigator for the local
prosecutor. It makes me wonder just what kind of police work he did on the
beat. A cop should know he had no business escalating a situation with a jogger
based on a hunch amounting to racial profiling. Any cop who wore the uniform
would know the Garner case, and that using lethal force to apprehend a fleeing
burglar was out of the question. He would also realize that running
empty-handed is not the MO of leaving the scene of a typical burglary unless
the burglar was already being chased by someone.
After the
shooting, the two men told Glynn County cops that they pursued Arbery with a
.357 Magnum revolver and a shotgun because they suspected him in a spate of
local break-ins There hadn’t been any break-ins for some time at that
particular time of the shooting.
If armed people in civilian clothes bear down on
you, run, but be prepared to fight. Chasing someone down in a truck and
cornering you is terrifying, and any sensible person would resist. I can only
imagine Arbery’s confusion and terror as going out for some exercise ended in a
failed struggle for his life. The courage he showed as he fought against two
armed men is humbling. If some angry stranger were waving a shotgun at me as he
closed in, I’d grab the barrel, too. Arbery did exactly what he should have done.
The story of a black man
executed by white vigilantes based on fear and one repeated a multitude of
times in American’s history. That it happened at the hands of a retired police
officer is a disgrace to the profession. The Garner case was making its way
through the courts as the nation’s lynchings by rope were winding down. The
last recorded one happened in 1981. Arbery’s death reminds me that while the
ropes are gone, lynchings are still happening by other means.
His
death reminds me that some places in the United States are trapped in its old
ways. Until video of the incident was made public, the Glynn county police and
prosecutor seemed prepared to let the Police officer McMichaels walk free,
reminiscent of the prosecutors and police who turned their backs on the
extrajudicial killings of blacks perpetrated by their friends and colleagues
for over a century in the postbellum south. Whether a suspect is innocent or
guilty, vigilante justice is a crime against the rule of law.
The National Memorial for Peace and Justice
in Montgomery, Alabama, is an unflinching record of America’s racial violence.
It has recorded 594 lynchings in Georgia. Rusted metal boxes are suspended from
the memorial’s roof, one for each county in America with a reported victim.
Their names are inscribed on them. The one for Glynn County, Georgia has three
victims on it: Henry Jackson, Robert Evarts and Wesley Lewis. There is now a fourth. His name is Ahmaud Arbery, lynched
in 2020 for jogging in a white neighborhood.
Narcotics officers who kill
innocent people in the war on drugs often don’t even face suspensions, let
alone criminal charges. But the conduct of three Atlanta police officers in the
killing of 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston was so unscrupulous that all three faced
criminal charges. Kathryn Johnston (June 26, 1914 – November 21, 2006) was an
elderly Atlanta, Georgia, woman who was killed by undercover police. Yes. She was a black woman. Does that come as
a surprise?
The three officers had entered
her home in what was later described as a 'botched' drug raid. Officers cut off
the burglar bars and broke down her door using a no-knock warrant. Police said
Johnston fired at them, obviously thinking they were home invaders and they
fired back in response. She fired only one shot out the door over the officers'
heads and they fired 39 shots, five or six of which hit her. None of the
officers were injured by her shooting at them at all. Two of the offices were
found guilty of her death.
No
questions asked, no weapons seen, no words offered or exchanged. Defendant
Bollinger blasted three shotgun rounds at the hapless and unarmed plaintiffs,
striking them and wounding them as they sought to take cover from assault,
leaving them in critical condition, bleeding face-down on the ground,” Pickett
says in the Dec. 3 complaint.
The men
say Bollinger was responding with no partner or backup to a report of a home
invasion robbery by two black men who might be armed with handguns, at the
apartment complex where Pickett’s cousin lived. The “sketchy information” about
the robbers said only that they were black men, according to the complaint.
Lewis stood by the security gate at the front of the apartment complex, smoking
a cigarette, while Pickett punched in the pass code and said he was going to
see his cousin.
Then, without
a warning, without investigation,
without any knowledge of who was in the area, of who the suspects were or what
they looked like, and in violation of all training and standard police
protocol, Police Officer Bollinger approached the apartment gate and
immediately shot Mr. Lewis and Mr. Pickett.
Pickett,
who was a handyman and who has a son and was engaged to be married at the time,
suffered seven gunshot wounds, including one to his head. Lewis, a husband and
father of four, was shot once in the back and three times in the legs.
After
other officers arrived and handcuffed them, the men said, “It became apparent
that the wrong men had been shot as a result of Bolliger’s rash, reckless and
life-endangering conduct.”
Though
they lay bleeding and handcuffed, “in critical condition,” the men say, the
officers “set out to cover up the shooting of these two innocent, unarmed men.”
The
cover-up was a bogus story that Lewis and/or Pickett had pointed guns at Bolliger,
according to the complaint. “The problem for defendant Bolliger and the rest of
defendant police officers was that neither plaintiff was armed; neither
possessed a weapon of any kind. Likewise, neither plaintiff was in possession
of any of the stolen items supposedly taken by the suspect in the robbery.
Nor did
the people who reported the home invasion identify them as the robbers. T hey
claim that the first photos taken of the scene where they were shot do not show
any weapon nor any of the stolen items. Some of the responding officers to the
scene failed to see any weapons purportedly belonging to either
victims. Somehow, however, two handguns appeared and stolen items appeared
as well. It was determined by subsequent forensic analysis before plaintiffs’
criminal trial, proved that neither of the victims were in any way connected physically with the
weapons or the items.
The men
say it took nearly an hour for them to receive medical attention, and that when
paramedics did arrive, “Bolliger refused to let them tend to the critically
wounded plaintiffs. Picket had said that
Bolliger told him that “he did not give a fuck that he had shot the man in the head.
Bollinger and the other officers had staged a
crime scene to conform to their story, arrested the men on false charges, including murder of the
pedestrian killed by the police car, attempted murder of Bollinger, and
carrying loaded firearms, according to their testimony.
The
officers also “conducted tainted six-pack lineups in an effort to get the
purported robbery victims to identify (them),” falsified reports and gave false
testimony against them, according to the victim’s testimony.
Pickett
and Lewis say they spent a year in jail awaiting their trial and throughout a
jury trial that started in December 2013 and eventually exonerated them.
They
seek punitive damages for civil rights violations, unreasonable and excessive
force, false arrest, malicious prosecution, and failure to intervene, train,
supervise and discipline the officers . Also
named as defendants are Inglewood police Officers Navid Khansari, Joe Lisardi,
Michael Han and Jack Aranda. As of this date.
I don’t know the results of the civil
trial.
Jordan Edwards, 15, was trying
to leave a house party that had gotten out of control . But the black teenager
would never get home that night because, as he sat in a car, a police officer
shot and killed him.
The officer involved in the shooting, Roy Oliver, has
been charged with murder,
with a judge signing an arrest warrant. police Officer Oliver had already been
fired earlier, because he “violated several departmental policies.”
Police in Balch Springs, Texas, a majority-minority Dallas
suburb originally claimed there was
an altercation in the vehicle. Edwards, who was unarmed, was sitting in the
front passenger’s seat, with four other unarmed teens, including Edwards’s
brother. who were also in the car.
Oliver shot at the car with a
rifle. A bullet broke through the front passenger’s window and hit Edwards.
Shortly after, Edwards was rushed to a hospital, where he died from gunshot
injuries. No officers were injured in the incident.
Balch
Springs Police Chief Jonathan Haber at first said that the the car backed up
toward responding officers “in an aggressive manner.”
After his original statement, however, Haber said
that he “misspoke. ”He clarified that
the car was in fact driving away from
officers, not toward them. He added, “After
reviewing video, I don’t believe that it [the shooting] met our core values.”
The party Edwards left was
crowded, with unsupervised, drunk teens fighting before gunshots were fired.
According to the family attorney, Edwards “was leaving a house party because he
thought it was getting dangerous. Actually, the danger was waiting for him
outside the party.
Thirty-nine of shooting
victms by police were unarmed. Four were killed by police stun guns and another
nine died in custody, a continuing problem in American jails. But the
majority of black people killed by police were fatally shot to death.
Based on a tracker
from The Washington Post,
at least 232 black folks were shot and killed. (The Guardian’s figures include
all deaths resulting directly from encounters with law enforcement, while the Post counts only people who were shot
and killed by police.
The Post found that 34 percent of the unarmed
people killed in 2016 were black males, which is quite
disproportionate since black men make up only 6 percent of the U.S. population.
There was also a considerable uptick in deaths caught on camera via cellphone
and police cameras.
I could go further in telling
you more instances of cops killing innocent blacks but that will be for another
article.
As far as I am concerned, shooting
unarmed blacks is no different than lynching them.
Lynching
has been a major component of racial violence in the United States since the
end of the Civil War. While Americans of every racial background have been
subjected to this violence, a disproportionate number of lynchings have been in
the U.S. South and most of the victims were African American women, men, and
children. Equal Justice Initiative
titled, Lynching in America,
has a listing of over 4,000 murders by white people.
Alas. I
have to conclude that a great number of white people in the United States e are rabid racists.
No comments:
Post a Comment