Stupid Statements
(Part XVII)
We
are all prone to making stupid statements during our lifetimes but some people
make them a great deal of the time and some make really stupid statements. Here
are some of the really stupid statements uttered by obviously stupid
people.
Rob Ford
This man is the mayor of Toronto, Ontario and who is undoubtedly one of the
stupidest mayors that has ever been elected in that city. The stupidity of this
man is so obvious when you realize not only what he did while driving on a busy
expressway in downtown Toronto at 70 kilometres an hour while reading but also
what he said about his stupid act.
We all know that when we are driving
our vehicles, it is extremely important that we concentrate on our driving and
that is why we have laws that prohibits us from using hand-held devices while
driving. Unfortunately, we don’t have a law in Canada that prohibits us from
reading newspapers, books or even government reports while we are driving our
vehicles. Recently, this political twit was reading a report which was in his
right hand while he was driving his car along the expressway at 70 kilometres
an hour. Both hands are supposed to be on the steering wheel.
Thousands of people saw him do it
when it was shown on Twitter. When a reporter asked him if he reads while
driving his car, he replied (brace yourself for it) “Yeah, probably.” What does he mean by probably? He knew that he had
been photographed doing it and that it was on Twitter.
He attempted to justify his conduct
on the road by saying; “Trying to catch
up on my work, you know. I keep my eyes on the road, but I am a busy man.” A driver should keep his eyes on the road
all the time, He can’t do that if he is reading while he is driving his
vehicle.
At the time he was being questioned
by the reporter, he was initially talking about a trade mission. He was
obviously upset with the reporter’s question with respect to his driving. He
said to the reporter. “I don’t know what
that (his driving) has to do with
the trade mission. Ridiculous questions sometimes.”
It was not a ridiculous question.
The mayor is expected to drive his car properly and not be distracted by
reading at the same time when his eyes should be on the road ahead of him at
all times. If this twit had an accident and someone was seriously injured or
killed, his excuse that he was reading a report because he is a busy man and
this resulted in him being distracted while driving his car will get him no
sympathy at all from the court or the rest of the driving public.
Earlier this
year, Ford faced another round of questions after allegedly driving past the
open doors of a streetcar, (which is illegal) causing an exchange of words with
the streetcar operator. Last year, Ford avoided a distracted driving charge for
speaking on his cell phone while driving. That is also illegal. The incident
first came to light after a woman accused the mayor of giving her and her
daughter the finger after she asked him to hang up the cell phone.
Generally it is the politicians who make stupid statements and that is probably because most of what they say publicly is recorded in the media.
Krista Ford
This silly 21-year-old
woman is the niece of Mayor Ford and like many young people, she too made a
stupid statement. While she was interviewed on a radio program called Talk Radio at AM 640 on August 31st
2012, she expressed her concern about
recent attacks on women in Toronto’s west end by offering the following
suggestion to women, “Stay alert, walk tall,
carry mace, take self- defence courses and don’t dress like a whore.”
First of all, it is illegal
for anyone in Canada other than the police to carry mace or even be in
possession of it. Second of all, women who have dressed conservatively have
also been sexually attacked by men.
She later apologized for
making that silly statement but what is most interesting is that photos of her
have been seen on news sites worldwide while being scantily clad. The Daily Mail in England described her
as a former Lingerie Football player who dressed extremely provocatively in her
Twitter profile picture. It reminds me of that old saw, “Don’t do as I do, do
as I say.”
Here are some examples of
pure lunacy made by two other politicians.
Todd Akin
This inane Missouri
Republican Congressman who is running for office again was speaking about women
who are raped. He said, (brace yourself for it) “It seems to me, first of all, from what I understand from doctors,
that’s (impregnation) really rare.” unquote
I can only presume that the
doctors he spoke with are all quacks. Did he speak with a gynecologist?
Probably not. My mother was raped by a man she was going out with and believe
me when I say that my ensuing birth was not a rare event. My birth was
inevitable as almost all births that are not aborted whether or not the mother
was raped. This political hack actually believes that a woman who has a child
because of a date rape or a violent rape and enjoys the raping experience will
invariably have a child but if she doesn’t enjoy the experience, she won’t have
a child. Give me a break. Does this nitwit have any idea as to how babies are
conceived when their fathers raped their mothers? What is really frightening is that some of
his constituents with the same lack of brains might actually vote him into
office despite the fact that the Republicans are asking him to withdraw from
the Congressional race.
George Galloway
This British member of
Parliament is another nitwit who when discussing the accusation of a Swedish
woman who said that Julian Assange allegedly raped her as she was sleeping
said, (Again I suggest that you brace yourself) “It may be sordid and bad sexual etiquette, but whatever else it is, it
is not rape or (otherwise) you bankrupt the term rape of all meaning.” unquote
Does what he said apply to
committing murder? If so, then he would
also say about the killer who with premedication
stabs his victim in the back, “It may be sordid and bad manners, but
whatever else it is, it is not murder or (otherwise) you bankrupt the term murder
of all meaning.”
This judge said with respect to
imprisoning a blind man in prison, “Such
a sentence is in breach of the United Nations convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities.” I have studied that Convention and there is
nothing said about imprisoning people with disabilities. For example, when the
Guelph Reformatory for first offenders in Ontario was built, they had a unit
that was used only for prisoners suffering from TB. They couldn’t leave the
unit, not even to exercise outside the unit. The government actions weren’t in
conflict with the human rights of those particular prisoners. When condemned
prisoners in the US are placed on death row, they are in their cells 23 hours
each day and admittedly they are denied their civil rights, but it is for the
protection of other prisoners. The
Correctional authorities in Alberta said that they could accommodate the blind
man as they have accommodated a blind man in the past and still accommodate
disabled persons. The judge made a silly statement without any justification
whatsoever.
Tom Flanagan
The United States Department of Justice
estimates that child-sex pornographers have recorded the abuse of more than one
million children in the United States alone. The production of child
pornography has become very profitable and is no longer limited to paedophiles.
Organized crime is involved in the production
and distribution of child pornography therefore when someone downloads child
pornography for a price; they are contributing to the wealth of child
pornographers so that they can continue abusing and filming sex-abused
children.
Flanagan realized that he
made a terrible mistake making that statement and apologized. It didn’t help
his career however.
One of the two ethnic Chechens involved in the Boston
Marathon bombings in 2013 had been under partial FBI surveillance for at least
three years. Their mother told the English-language Russia Today television station in a phone interview, a recording
of which was obtained by Reuters, “I believe
that my sons are innocent and have been framed. Tamerlan was controlled by the
FBI, like, for three to five years.”
He was killed in a shootout with
police and his younger 19-year-old brother Dzhokhar was captured after a
day-long manhunt. Her sons were not under the control of the FBI but the older
brother was interviewed at the request of the Russian government several years
ago.
The mother later said, “If they are going to kill him. (youngest son) I don’t care. My oldest son is killed, so I don’t care. I don’t care
if my youngest son is going to be killed today. I want the world to hear this.
And, I don’t care if I am going to get killed too. And I will say, Allahu
Akbar!” (God is Great)
She also said, “Those persons shown on TV are actors, not my sons.”
I wonder if she will ever believe that her sons
were the Boston Marathon Bombers as the evidence is stacking up against them
and the younger son has admitted to a number of people that he and his older
brother were the Boston Marathon bombers.
When she was speaking about her oldest son, Tamerlan,
she screamed, “Why did they kill him? Why did they have to kill him? They got him alive. He was in
their hands.”
Tamerlan was shot during a standoff with police
and was run over by a car driven by his younger brother as he escaped from the
scene.
When
describing the scenes of the bombings, she said, “It is a 'really big play with paint instead of blood.”
Zubeidat Tsarnaeva had known as early as 2011 that her son had been radicalised and sent text messages to family in Russia suggesting he was willing to die for Islam.
This man is the father of
the two Boston bombers. He said on April 22nd, “Tamerlan was driving him to school when they started shooting at them.”
Who told him that? His two sons were fleeing in a high jacked car.
He also said, “Tamerlan had been detained alive rather
than dying in a shootout with police and later killed”
The pictures on TV showed
that he had been shot by police when the brothers were shooting at them and
after he fell to the ground, his younger brother accidentally ran over him with
the high jacked car. He was declared dead within ten
minutes of being taken to a local hospital.
When asked what he would say to his surviving son, he said: “Give up. Give up. You have a bright future ahead of you. Come home to Russia.”
I hardly think his surviving son has a bright future ahead of him especially if he is facing the death penalty.
The
parents of the two Boston Marathon bombers are obviously in a state of denial.
John Norris
This man is the lawyer of Raed
Jaser who is one of the suspects of an alleged two-man terrorist plot to bomb a
VIA train going from Toronto and into the United States. When the suspects
appeared in court on the 24th of April, 2013, the lawyer representing
Jasper said in part, “The timing of the
arrest is a bit of a mystery and I would certainly like to hear the explanation
of the RCMP (federal police) for that. They’ve (the RCMP) been very clear that
there were [was] no risk of public safety.”
He suspected that the timing of
the arrest was brought about by the Canadian government’s recent proposal for
dealing with terrorists and the arrest of the surviving Boston Marathon terrorist.
He may be right but so what? I believe that it was appropriate to arrest the
two suspects because the police believed that they had enough evidence to get a
conviction against the two men and that delaying the arrest might very well have
increased the risk to the passengers taking the fatal train.
The RCMP were not saying that
there was no risk. They were saying that just prior to the arrest; the two
suspects didn’t appear to be taking immediate steps to place a bomb on the
train. However, there is always a risk when terrorists are planning to commit a
terrorist act. You can never be absolutely sure when the moment arrives when they
will suddenly commit the act. The sooner they are taken into custody, the safer
it is for society. We will have to wait to see if the two suspects arrested by
the RCMP are guilty of terrorism.
The Oscar-winning actress and her
husband were stopped by the police when her husband’s driving looked
suspicious. He was charged with driving under the influence. When she began
leaving the car, she was ordered to remain in the car. In response to that
order, she replied, “Do you know who I
am? You are about to find out You’re about to be on National News.” Guess
what. The officer wasn’t on national news but she was and she certainly will be
during her trial for disorderly conduct. She later admitted that her conduct
was disrespectful to the officer. Too smart, too late.
No comments:
Post a Comment