AMBER ALERTS
If you click your mouse over the underlined
words you will get more
information.
In 1996, 9-year-old Amber Hagerman was kidnapped from Arlington, Texas
and brutally murdered. Her death had a profound impact on her community. In the
wake of this tragedy, an emergency alert system was developed to facilitate the
rapid distribution of information to the public about child abduction
incidents. The system, named in remembrance of Amber Hagerman, was initially a
voluntary partnership between law enforcement agencies and media broadcasters
to send out emergency alerts to the public when a child was abducted or missing
and believed to be in imminent danger. Alas, the girl’s murderer was never
found.
The information provided below in this article is intended as general information only. It is
not intended, and should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice.
The Amber Alert system
provides the public with immediate and up-to-date information about child
abduction or a child missing via widespread media broadcasts on television,
radio and wireless devices by soliciting the public’s assistance with the safe
and swift return of an abducted child or missing child.
The goal of an Amber Alert
is to involve as many community members as possible in the search for an
abducted child or missing child — each community member becoming the eyes and
the ears of law enforcement.
In Canada, Amber Alert programs are
provincially operated. While most provinces have Amber Alert committees, only
law enforcement can issue Amber Alerts that are sent out through the Alert Ready emergency alert system, reaching Canadians through a number of
mediums (e.g., cell phone, television, and
radio. Strangely enough, they aren’t sent over land phones for obvious
reasons. They would block emergency calls.
Criteria for issuing an
Amber Alert may vary from province to province, but basic requirements include:
- The child is under the
age of 18;
- A belief that the child
has been abducted or missing;
- A belief that the
child is in grave danger;
- Information is
available that may help locate the child and/or the abductor (e.g.,
description of the child, the suspect, or the vehicle driven by the
abductor); and
- abduction the child is
missing. That the alert be issued within a reasonable amount of time from
the moment of the Alert was announced.
Issuing an Amber Alert can be a very important
tool in helping to locate a child and a the suspect. It is important however to
remember, that these alerts are not appropriate in every circumstance and their
continued effectiveness depends on ensuring they are only used in cases that
meet the criteria outlined above, and where time is of the essence.
Despite plenty of
media coverage on its futility and public disgust of callers complaining of the
Alerts that are tying up 911 operators Complainers are still clogging emergency
lines across Ontario to gripe about being woken up even when a child’s life may
be in danger.
Around
midnight on July 24th 2019 the father of a child broke into a house
in Brantford. Ontario while accomplices distracted the mother. The man then
assaulted and threatened the mother before grabbing their two-year-old son and
fleeing in a getaway car. He was later captured and the child was returned to
his mother.
An hour after the alert was
broadcasted, the child was found safe which
then triggering another mass notification being sent to Ontarians’
phones.
I saw this Alert while I
was watching TV the same morning. What upset me was that the Amber Alert
remained on the television for an entire hour. The Alert blocked out the voices
in the television program I was watching making it impossible foe me to watch the program because the voice
attached to the Alert blocked out the voices in the program.
I don’t object to the
written portion of the Alert being posted at the bottom of the television
program but when the voice of the Alert blocks out the sound from the program,
in my opinion, this is really annoying, especially when the Alerts last an
hour.
Three
hours later just after 3 a.m. a province-wide mass notification was sent to
Ontarians’ cell phones, waking many people up. This led to yet another round of
angry people tying up 911 operators across the province. There were
approximately 100 calls in the 911 queue, over forty were confirmed to be from
people complaining. One woman in particular advised that the only way the Amber
Alert ‘problem’ was going to stop would be to flood 911 with calls. She then
called back a number of times. Her act
was criminal and she should be prosecuted.
people who had been woken up by the shrill alarm that
goes with it The Alert meant a loss of sleep for potentially millions of,
leading to a growing call for the Alert system to be overhauled.
When an emergency operator is unavailable during high call
periods since people are complaining about the Alerts, the calls continue to
ring indefinitely until an operator becomes available. By then, the emergency
has become a disaster because the police couldn’t be reached on the phone. That
is why it has been suggested that such callers complaining about the Alerts
should be fined as a deterrent.
The latest Amber Alert comes on
the heels of a
petition calling
for the Ontario government to make a new law enabling police to fine 911
abusers that is similar to an Alberta law allowing police to slap
first-offenders with a $5,000 fine, and $10,000 for repeat offenders.
Unlike Americans, Canadians are unable to opt-out of emergency
notifications on their smartphones. Even so, there are ways you can give yourself a sleep that is uninterrupted by Amber
Alerts.
Some models don’t emit sounds when
they’re on silent or vibrate or are in the do-not-disturb mode, others can be
overridden, according to Canadian Wireless Telecommunications
Association.
Depending on the device, some
newer Android phones offer Canadian users an emergency alert opt-out option in
their notification settings. The only foolproof way is to turn
it off completely.
That is what I do just before I go to bed. If my cellphone got the
message at three in the morning, what could I do to look out for the abducted
or missing child at that particular hour especially if child was taken or
missing from another city?
A University of
Nevada study that
was conducted over a decade ago determined that Amber Alerts accomplished far
less than claimed by law enforcement. It determined that most cases involved a
family member and played no role in the return of abducted children. The majority
of its success was in child custody fights in which there was, statistically, a
lower risk of harm to the child.
Saskatchewan’s Zach Miller disagrees
completely with those findings. In 2006, he was kidnapped by a stranger as a
10-year-old. Twenty-four hours after he went missing, police decided to issue
the first Amber Alert in Saskatchewan’s history. After a passerby noticed the
vehicle reported in the alert, Miller and another boy were rescued. In all,
Miller spent 72 hours being held captive by the notorious
pedophile Peter
Whitmore. If the Alert had been sounded earlier, the boys might have been
rescued sooner than they were.
Alberta became the first Canadian
province to use the system in 2002. Today, each province maintains control on
how the system is used.
The U.S. system relies on
different tiers of alarms. The most serious is called a Presidential Alert and
can’t be blocked. Other alarms are used for less dire situations and can be
targeted to specific geographic locations.
Some of the nations in Europe have
similar Alert systems.
No comments:
Post a Comment